The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inhibition of neuronal acetylcholine sensitivity by α-toxins from Bungarus multicinctus venom
Open accessAbstract
Bungarus multicinctus venom contains several α-toxins in addition to the widely used α-bungarotoxin (Bgt 2.2). We have found that two of the α-toxins (Bgt 3.1 and 3.3) inhibit neuronal acetylcholine (AcCho) sensitivity when tested on ciliary ganglion neurons in cell culture. Over 90% of the AcCho sensitivity recorded in response to iontophoretic application of AcCho was blocked when the neurons were incubated with either of the toxins at 10 -7 M for 1 hr at 37°C. The blockade could be partially reversed by incubating the neurons for 1-2 hr in medium lacking the toxins. The neurons also had a high-affinity binding site for Bgt 2.2, as indicated by binding studies with rhodamine-labeled Bgt 2.2. Concentrations of Bgt 2.2(10 -7 M) that should be nearly adequate to saturate the high-affinity site, however, had no detectable effect on AcCho sensitivity of the neurons. Higher concentrations of Bgt 2.2(10 -5 M) produced a partial inhibition of AcCho sensitivity, suggesting either that the neurons had two classes of binding sites for Bgt 2.2 (with the low-affinity site affecting AcCho sensitivity) or that the preparation of Bgt 2.2 contained minor components (e.g., Bgt 3.1 or 3.3) that were responsible for the blockade. The mechanisms by which Bgt 3.1 and 3.3 inhibit neuronal AcCho sensitivity remain unknown. If they bind specifically to the AcCho receptor, they will be useful agents for studying the distribution and regulation of this membrane component.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schoepfer, R., Conroy, W. G., Whiting, P., Gore, M., & Lindstrom, J. (1990) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(90)90031-a · Cited by 473
Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors as Targets for Drug Discovery
Holladay, M. W., Dart, M. J., & Lynch, J. K. (1997) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm970377o · Cited by 444
Functional Expression of a New Pharmacological Subtype of Brain Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor
Wada, K., Ballivet, M., Boulter, J., Connolly, J., Wada, E., Deneris, E. S., Swanson, L. W., Heinemann, S., & Patrick, J. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2832952 · Cited by 310
Miller, M. M., Silver, J., & Billiar, R. B. (1982) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(82)91261-6 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Ravdin, P. M., & Berg, D. K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1979-04
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2072-2076
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2099957101
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhibition of neuronal acetylcholine sensitivity by α-toxins from Bungarus multicinctus venom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.76.4.2072
- The paper
- Ravdin, P. M., & Berg, D. K. (1979). Inhibition of neuronal acetylcholine sensitivity by α-toxins from Bungarus multicinctus venom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.4.2072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.