The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conditioned responses in courtship behavior of normal and mutant Drosophila
Open accessAbstract
Male courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster is modified by prior sexual experience. Whereas naive males nearly always court virgin females persistently, males previously paired with unreceptive fertilized females subsequently court virgin females in an abbreviated manner, if at all. The probability of diminished male courtship is directly related to the duration of the prior “conditioning” period with a fertilized female. Naive males court fertilized females less vigorously than they court virgins; this depression of male behavior occurs even if the male is blind or if the fertilized female cannot actively reject his courtship. These results suggest that fertilized females are a source of both courtship-provoking and courtship-inhibiting olfactory cues and that the central association of these cues in males is sufficient to bring about the retention of modified courtship behavior. Mutant “amnesiac” males, selected as memory-deficient in a learning test unrelated to courtship [Quinn, W. G., Sziber, P. P. & Booker, R. (1979) Nature (London) 277, 212-214], are trainable by exposure to fertilized females, but the experience-dependent behavior—diminished courtship performance—wanes abnormally rapidly—i.e., less than 1 hour, compared to 2-3 hr for wild-type flies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The neuronal architecture of the mushroom body provides a logic for associative learning
Aso, Y., Hattori, D., Yu, Y., Johnston, R. M., Iyer, N. A., Ngo, T.-T., Dionne, H., Abbott, L., Axel, R., Tanimoto, H., et al. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.04577 · Cited by 1,051
The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence
BONDURIANSKY, R. (2001) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793101005693 · Cited by 1,018
Livingstone, M. S., Sziber, P. P., & Quinn, W. G. (1984) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(84)90316-7 · Cited by 587
Drosophila: Genetics meets behaviour
Sokolowski, M. B. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35098592 · Cited by 470
A few chemical words exchanged byDrosophila during courtship and mating
Jallon, J.-M. (1984) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01065444 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Siegel, R. W., & Hall, J. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1979-07
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3430-3434
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1988694109
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conditioned responses in courtship behavior of normal and mutant Drosophila. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.76.7.3430
- The paper
- Siegel, R. W., & Hall, J. C. (1979). Conditioned responses in courtship behavior of normal and mutant Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.7.3430
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.