The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prediction of peptide retention times in high-pressure liquid chromatography on the basis of amino acid composition
Open accessAbstract
Analysis of peptides by reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography would be simplified if retention times could be predicted by summing the contribution to retention of each of the peptide's amino acid side chains. This paper describes the derivation of values (“retention coefficients”) that represent the contribution to retention of each of the common amino acids and end groups. Peptide retention times were determined on a Bio-Rad “ODS” column at room temperature with a linear gradient from 0.1 M NaclO 4 , pH 7.4 or 2.1, at 0 min to 60% acetonitrile/0.1 M NaclO 4 at 80 min. The NaclO 4 , a chaotropic agent, was added to improve peak shape and to minimize conformational effects. Retention coefficients for the amino acids were computed by using a Hewlett-Packard 9815A calculator programmed to change the retention coefficients for all amino acids sequentially to obtain a maximum correlation between actual and predicted retention times. Correlations of 0.999 at pH 7.4 and 0.997 at pH 2.1 were obtained for 25 peptides including glucagon, oxytocin, [Met]enkephalin, neurotensin, and somatostatin. This high degree of correlation suggests that, for peptides containing up to 20 residues, retention is primarily due to partition processes that involve all the residues. Although steric or conformational factors do have some effect on retention, the data suggest that under the above chromatographic conditions the retention of peptides containing up to 20 residues can be predicted solely on the basis of their amino acid composition. This possibility was tested by using data taken from the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ishihama, Y., Oda, Y., Tabata, T., Sato, T., Nagasu, T., Rappsilber, J., & Mann, M. (2005) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m500061-mcp200 · Cited by 2,055
Pierschbacher, M. D., & Ruoslahti, E. (1987) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)45376-8 · Cited by 649
Gilar, M., Olivova, P., Daly, A. E., & Gebler, J. C. (2005) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.200500116 · Cited by 425
The Microtubule-associated Protein Tau Is Extensively Modified with O-linked N-acetylglucosamine
Arnold, C. S., Johnson, G. W., Cole, R. N., Dong, D. L.-Y., Lee, M., & Hart, G. W. (1996) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.46.28741 · Cited by 361
Hypothesis about the function of membrane-buried proline residues in transport proteins.
Brandl, C. J., & Deber, C. M. (1986) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.83.4.917 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Meek, J. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1980-03
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1632-1636
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2083522539
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of peptide retention times in high-pressure liquid chromatography on the basis of amino acid composition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.77.3.1632
- The paper
- Meek, J. L. (1980). Prediction of peptide retention times in high-pressure liquid chromatography on the basis of amino acid composition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.77.3.1632
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.