The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enhanced graphic matrix analysis of nucleic acid and protein sequences.
Open accessAbstract
The enhanced graphic matrix procedure analyzes nucleic acid and amino acid sequences for features of possible biological interest and reveals the spatial patterns of such features. When a sequence is compared to itself the technique shows regions of self-complementarity, direct repeats, and palindromic subsequences. Comparison of two different sequences, exemplified by immunoglobulin kappa light chain genes, by using colored graphic matrices showed domains of similarity, regions of divergence, and features explainable by transpositions. Analysis of mouse constant domain immunoglobulin sequences revealed self-complementary regions that can be used to fold the molecule into a structure consistent with electron microscopic observations. Computer translation of nucleic acid sequences into all possible amino acid sequences followed by graphic matrix analysis provides a way to detect the most likely protein encoding regions and can predict the correct reading frames in sequences in which splicing patterns are not defined. Application of this technique to regions of simian virus 40 and polyoma virus demonstrates the frames of translation and shows the agreement of sequences determined in separate laboratories with different virus isolates. The graphic matrix technique can also be used to assemble fragmentary sequences during determination, to display local variations in base composition, to detect distant evolutionary relationships, and to display intragenic variation in rates of evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.
Pearson, W. R., & Lipman, D. J. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444 · Cited by 11,227
Rapid and sensitive protein similarity searches
Lipman, D. J., & Pearson, W. R. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2983426 · Cited by 4,033
Rapid similarity searches of nucleic acid and protein data banks.
Wilbur, W. J., & Lipman, D. J. (1983) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.80.3.726 · Cited by 1,546
The complete sequence of dystrophin predicts a rod-shaped cytoskeletal protein
Koenig, M., Monaco, A. P., & Kunkel, L. M. (1988) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90383-2 · Cited by 1,538
The human LDL receptor: A cysteine-rich protein with multiple Alu sequences in its mRNA
Yamamoto, T., Davis, C. G., Brown, M. S., Schneider, W. J., Casey, M. L., Goldstein, J. L., & Russell, D. W. (1984) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(84)90188-0 · Cited by 1,382
Metadata
- Authors
- Maizel, J. V., & Lenk, R. P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1981-12
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7665-7669
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1987809783
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced graphic matrix analysis of nucleic acid and protein sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.78.12.7665
- The paper
- Maizel, J. V., & Lenk, R. P. (1981). Enhanced graphic matrix analysis of nucleic acid and protein sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.78.12.7665
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.