Cited by 365Lysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchGlycogen Storage Diseases and MyoclonusMetabolism and Genetic Disorders

Molecular defect in combined beta-galactosidase and neuraminidase deficiency in man.

Open access
D'Azzo, A, Hoogeveen, A, Reuser, A J, Robinson, D, Galjaard, H·1982·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

In normal human fibroblasts, an enzymically active 85,000-dalton precursor form of beta-galactosidase is processed, via a number of intermediates, into a mature 64,000-dalton form. In addition there is an enzymically inactive 32,000-dalton component and its 54,000-dalton precursor. In fibroblasts from patients with a combined deficiency of beta-galactosidase and neuraminidase these last two components are absent and hardly any mature beta-galactosidase can be demonstrated. Nevertheless, in the mutant fibroblasts, precursor beta-galactosidase is synthesized and processed normally. The excessive intralysosomal degradation that is responsible for the deficiency of mature beta-galactosidase can be partially corrected by addition of the protease inhibitor leupeptin, which results in the accumulation of 85,000-dalton precursor beta-galactosidase and of a partially processed 66,000-dalton form. When mutant cells were grown in the presence of a "corrective factor" purified from the medium of NH4Cl-stimulated cell cultures, both beta-galactosidase and neuraminidase activities were restored to low control levels. The immunoprecipitation pattern was completely normal after addition of the corrective factor, and mature 64,000-dalton beta-galactosidase accumulated in the mutant fibroblasts. We propose that the combined beta-galactosidase/neuraminidase deficiency is caused by a defective 32,000-dalton glycoprotein which is normally required to protect beta-galactosidase and neuraminidase against excessive intralysosomal degradation and to give these enzymes their full hydrolytic activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.79.15.4535

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An antiserum raised against purified β-GAL precipitated the enzyme with three previously unknown proteins of 54-, 32-, and 20-kDa from human fibroblasts.

    “An antiserum raised against purified β-GAL precipitated this enzyme with three previously unknown proteins of 54-, 32-, 20-kDa from human fibroblasts 5.”
  • The corrective factor secreted in the medium and capable of restoring NEU1 and β-GAL activities in GS fibroblasts was discovered because of its physical association with β-GAL.

    “The identity of this “corrective factor” secreted in the medium and capable of restoring NEU1 and β-GAL activities in GS fibroblasts was eventually discovered fortuitously because of its physical association with β-GAL 4,5.”
  • A small pool of phosphorylated PPCA precursor can be recovered extracellularly, but this secreted form can be re-internalized via mannose-6-phosphate receptor-mediated endocytosis and routed to lysosomes where it becomes catalytically active.

    “A small pool of phosphorylated precursor can also be recovered extracellularly, but this secreted form can be re-internalized by cells via mannose-6-phosphate receptor-mediated endocytosis and routed to the lysosomes where it becomes catalytically active as the de novo synthesized enzyme 5,6.”
  • The three proteins were products of a single gene, and the 54-kDa polypeptide was the uncleaved precursor of the 32- and 20-kDa proteins.

    “It was soon apparent that the three proteins were the products of a single gene and that the 54-kDa polypeptide was in fact the uncleaved precursor of the 32- and 20-kDa proteins 5.”
  • The 54-kDa precursor was the extracellular form that, once taken up by GS cells, restored NEU1 and β-GAL activities and their lysosomal stability.

    “The 54-kDa precursor was also the form present extracellularly that once taken up by GS cells restored NEU1 and β-GAL activities and their lysosomal stability.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D'Azzo, A., Hoogeveen, A., Reuser, A. J., Robinson, D., & Galjaard, H.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1982-08
Volume
79
Issue
15
Pages
4535-4539
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2075493559
Cited by
365
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
18.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Keywords
lysosomal storage disease, beta-galactosidase, neuraminidase, leupeptin, correction factors, fibroblasts
MeSH terms
beta-Galactosidase, Cells, Cultured, Enzyme Precursors, Fibroblasts, Humans, Lactose Intolerance, Leupeptins, Lysosomes, Molecular Weight, Neuraminidase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review