Cited by 413Evolution and Paleontology StudiesAnimal Behavior and ReproductionMorphological variations and asymmetry

Birds, behavior, and anatomical evolution.

Open access
Wyles, J S, Kunkel, J G, Wilson, A C·1983·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Study of more than 200 species suggests that the anatomical differences among birds are as big as those among other vertebrates of comparable taxonomic rank. The result is notable because, for more than 100 years, many biologists have believed that birds are more uniform anatomically than other classes of vertebrates. Furthermore, assessment of biochemical and geological evidence suggests that the time scale for bird evolution could be quite short. Hence, birds may share with placental mammals the distinction of having had a high rate of anatomical evolution, compared to that in lower vertebrates. The rate appears to have been very high in songbirds and higher primates and extremely high in the genus Homo. In an attempt to explain such contrasts in rates of anatomical evolution, we advance the hypothesis that in higher vertebrates, behavior, rather than environmental change, is the major driving force for evolution at the organismal level. This hypothesis predicts accelerated anatomical evolution in species composed of numerous mobile individuals with the dual capacity for behavioral innovation and social propagation of new habits. Consistent with this hypothesis, we demonstrate a correlation between relative brain size and rate of anatomical evolution in land vertebrates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.80.14.4394

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Given the lack of a relationship between phenotypic evolution and molecular rates, it seems unlikely that the observed faster rate of molecular evolution in more rapidly diversifying lineages is a result of species adapting to new niches.

    “Given the lack of a relationship between phenotypic evolution and molecular rates 19-21 , it seems unlikely that the observed faster rate of molecular evolution in more rapidly diversifying lineages is a result of species adapting to new niches.”

    From The modern molecular clock (2003) · cites this paper as [21]

  • So far there has been little evidence to support the proposition that the overall rate of adaptation or morphological change of a species might influence the molecular clock.

    “Although it is possible that the overall rate of adaptation or morphological change of a species might influence the molecular clock, so far there has been little evidence to support this proposition from either experimental studies 19 or comparative analyses 20,21 .”

    From The modern molecular clock (2003) · cites this paper as [21]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [1]Huxley, T. H. (1867) Proc. Zool. Soc. London 27, 415–472.
  2. [4]Marshall, A. J. (1962) in A Textbook of Zoology, eds. Parker, T. J. & Haswell, W. A. (Macmillan, London), Vol. 2, p. 555.
  3. [10]Feduccia, A. (1980) The Age of Birds (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA).
  4. [12]Prager, E. M. & Wilson, A. C. (1980) Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. 17, 1209-1214.
  5. [11]Alvarez, L. W. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 627–642.
  6. [13]Bush, G. L., Case, S. M., Wilson, A. C. & Patton, J. L. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 3942–3946.
  7. [18]Platel, R. (1979) in Biology of the Reptilia, eds. Gans, C., Northcutt, R. G. & Ulinski, P. (Academic, London), Vol. 9, pp. 147– 171.
  8. [23]Wilson, E. O. (1975) Sociobiology (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA), p. 697.
  9. [32]Lande, R. (1981) Proc. Natl. Ácad. Sci. USA 78, 3721–3725.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wyles, J. S., Kunkel, J. G., & Wilson, A. C.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1983-07
Volume
80
Issue
14
Pages
4394-4397
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1986229614
Cited by
413
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
27.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
birds, anatomical evolution, behavioral innovation, brain size, songbirds, primates, Homo, placental mammals, vertebrate evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Birds, Biological Evolution, Humans, Mutation, Selection, Genetic, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review