The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the use of sequence homologies to predict protein structure: identical pentapeptides can have completely different conformations.
Open accessAbstract
The search for amino acid sequence homologies can be a powerful tool for predicting protein structure. Discovered sequence homologies are currently used in predicting the function of oncogene proteins. To sharpen this tool, we investigated the structural significance of short sequence homologies by searching proteins of known three-dimensional structure for subsequence identities. In 62 proteins with 10,000 residues, we found that the longest isolated homologies between unrelated proteins are five residues long. In 6 (out of 25) cases we saw surprising structural adaptability: the same five residues are part of an alpha-helix in one protein and part of a beta-strand in another protein. These examples show quantitatively that pentapeptide structure within a protein is strongly dependent on sequence context, a fact essentially ignored in most protein structure prediction methods: just considering the local sequence of five residues is not sufficient to predict correctly the local conformation (secondary structure). Cooperativity of length six or longer must be taken into account. Also, we are warned that in the growing practice of comparing a new protein sequence with a data base of known sequences, finding an identical pentapeptide sequence between two proteins is not a significant indication of structural similarity or of evolutionary kinship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Self-citation
Cited by
Modeling of loops in protein structures
Fiser, A., Do, R. K. G., & Šali, A. (2000) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.9.9.1753 · Cited by 2,116
Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments
Rost, B. (1999) · Protein Engineering, Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/12.2.85 · Cited by 1,833
Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins.
Gribskov, M., McLachlan, A. D., & Eisenberg, D. (1987) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.84.13.4355 · Cited by 1,325
Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Sali, A. (2016) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/cpps.20 · Cited by 730
“Modeling Using MODELLER 2.9.22 Supplement 86 Current Protocols in Protein Science have the same conformation (Kabsch and Sander, 1984; Mezei, 1998).”
MethodInfluentialLanguage models generalize beyond natural proteins
Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Du, Y., Wicky, B. I. M., Milles, L. F., Dauparas, J., Baker, D., Ovchinnikov, S., Sercu, T., & Rives, A. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.21.521521 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Kabsch, W., & Sander, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1984-02
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1075-1078
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2005631746
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the use of sequence homologies to predict protein structure: identical pentapeptides can have completely different conformations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.81.4.1075
- The paper
- Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1984). On the use of sequence homologies to predict protein structure: identical pentapeptides can have completely different conformations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.81.4.1075
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.