Cited by 254RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms

Bacterial peptide chain release factors: Conserved primary structure and possible frameshift regulation of release factor 2

Open access
Craigen, W J, Cook, R G, Tate, W P, Caskey, C T·1985·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Escherichia coli peptide chain release factors are proteins that direct the termination of translation in response to specific peptide chain termination codons. The mechanisms of codon recognition and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis are unknown. We have characterized the genes encoding release factor 1 (RF-1) and release factor 2 (RF-2) to study the structure-function relationships of the proteins and their regulation in the bacterium. In this report, we present the gene structure of RF-1 and RF-2, and a partial peptide sequence of RF-2. RF-1 and RF-2 are highly homologous in their primary structure. In addition, an in-frame premature opal (UGA) termination codon is located within the RF-2 coding region at amino acid position 26. This region of the protein was sequenced by automated Edman degradation to confirm the predicted reading frame, and a second independent isolate of the RF-2 gene was identified and sequenced to confirm the DNA sequence. These results imply that a frameshift occurs prior to the premature termination codon, thus allowing for translation of RF-2 to be completed. This may represent a mechanism of translational control of RF-2 expression. An alternative possible means of translational regulation is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.82.11.3616

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In many cases, misreading UGA stop codons in prokaryotes is associated with a +1 frameshift.

    “However, in many cases, misreading UGA stop codons in prokaryotes is associated with a +1 frameshift [81,82,83,84].”

    From Detailed Dissection and Critical Evaluation of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA Vaccines (2021) · cites this paper as [82]

    The paper’s Discussion proposes a frameshift near an in-frame UGA codon in E. coli release factor 2, and describes a tRNA reported to translocate four bases, consistent with a +1 shift. It does not establish that UGA misreading is associated with +1 frameshifts in many prokaryotic cases; its discussion of other frameshifting examples does not make that broader claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [6]Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. & Coulson, A. R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5463–5467.
  2. [7]Biggin, M. D., Gibson, T. J. & Hong, G. F. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 3963–3965.
  3. [16]Campbell, J. M. (1978) Dissertation (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX).
  4. [21]Weiss, R. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 5797–5801.
  5. [27]Dayhoff, M. O. & Barker, W. C. (1972) in Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, ed. Dayhoff, M.O. (Natl. Biomed. Res. Found., Washington, DC), Vol. 5.
  6. [28]Goldstein, J. L., Beaudet, A. L. & Caskey, C. T. (1970) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 67, 99–106.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craigen, W. J., Cook, R. G., Tate, W. P., & Caskey, C. T.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1985-06
Volume
82
Issue
11
Pages
3616-3620
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2082138488
Cited by
254
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007330, 5 T32 GM07330-08)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Keywords
release factor 1, RF2, translation termination, Escherichia coli, frameshift mutation, translational regulation, gene structure, primary structure, codon recognition, peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis, structure-function relationship
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, DNA, Bacterial, Escherichia coli, Peptide Termination Factors, Protein Biosynthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review