The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contact pressures in the human hip joint measured in vivo.
Open accessAbstract
The pressures on human articular cartilage have been measured in vivo. An instrumented femoral head prosthesis that telemeters interarticular pressure at 10 discrete locations 253 times per second was implanted in apposition to natural acetabular cartilage. Data were acquired during surgery, recovery, rehabilitation, and normal activity, for longer than 1 year after surgery. Pressure magnitudes were synchronized with body-segment kinematic data and foot-floor force measurements so as to locate transduced pressure areas on the natural acetabulum and correlate movement kinematics and dynamics with local cartilage pressures. The data reveal very high local (up to 18 MPa) and nonuniform pressures, with abrupt spatial and temporal gradients, that correlate well both in magnitude and distribution with in vitro data and computer simulations of synovial joint mechanics. Peak pressures in vivo are, however, considerably higher than pressures measured in vitro under the putative forces experienced by the joint in life, particularly in normal movements where cocontraction occurs in agonist and antagonist muscles across the hip joint. Thus, extant gait-analysis studies which apply inverse Newtonian calculations to infer joint forces establish the lower limit on such forces, since such analyses include only the net muscular torques about the joint and cannot account for the contribution of the increment in joint force due to muscular cocontraction. Our data also contribute to the understanding of normal synovial joint tribology and the possible role of mechanical factors in the deterioration evident in osteoarthritis. Further, design criteria for both partial and total hip replacement prostheses and specific aspects of rehabilitation protocols following hip surgery (e.g., the extent to which crutches and canes unload the hip joint) warrant reconsideration in light of the extraordinary high pressures measured during the activities of daily living.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Local pressures up to ca. 20 MPa have been measured in hip joints, and mean pressure during peak of normal walking cycle is ca. 5 MPa.
“Through the use of implants with pressure sensors, local pressures up to ca. 20 MPa (ca. 200 atm) have been measured in hip joints [102, 103], while the mean pressure during the peak of a normal walking cycle is ca. 5 MPa.”
From Hydration lubrication (2013) · cites this paper as [103]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Klein, J. (2013) · Friction · doi:10.1007/s40544-013-0001-7 · Cited by 567
Lubrication of Articular Cartilage
Jahn, S., Seror, J., & Klein, J. (2016) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-081514-123305 · Cited by 406
Goldberg, R., Schroeder, A., Silbert, G., Turjeman, K., Barenholz, Y., & Klein, J. (2011) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201101053 · Cited by 179
Greenwood, N. L., Duffell, L. D., Alexander, C. M., & McGregor, A. H. (2011) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.math.2011.07.005 · Cited by 42
“Since high levels of co-contraction of antagonistic muscles can increase joint compression (Hodge et al., 1986), the use of this strategy during simple tasks such as quiet standing in the BJHS subjects might put them at higher risk of cartilage degeneration.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hodge, W. A., Fijan, R. S., Carlson, K. L., Burgess, R. G., Harris, W. H., & Mann, R. W.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1986-05
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2879-2883
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC323410
- OpenAlex
- W2004304953
- Cited by
- 623
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 7.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (AM16116)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip disorders and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
- Keywords
- hip joint, acetabular cartilage, co-contraction, gait analysis, hip osteoarthritis, activities of daily living
- MeSH terms
- Biomechanical Phenomena, Cartilage, Articular, Hip Joint, Hip Prosthesis, Humans, Movement, Muscle Contraction, Pressure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review