Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 529

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biological function of pathogenesis-related proteins: Four tobacco pathogenesis-related proteins are chitinases

Open access
Legrand, Michel, Kauffmann, Serge, Geoffroy, Pierrette, Fritig, Bernard·1987·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Four endochitinases (poly[1,4-( N -acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide)] glycanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.14) have been purified from leaves of Nicotiana tabacum cv. Samsun NN reacting hypersensitively to tobacco mosaic virus. Two of them are acidic proteins of molecular weights 27,500 and 28,500 and have been identified as 2 of the 10 pathogenesis-related proteins that are known to accumulate in tobacco in response to stress or pathogen attack. These two pathogenesis-related proteins, named “P” and “Q” when their biological function was unknown, account for one-third of tobacco mosaic virus-induced chitinase activity of tobacco leaves. They are serologically closely related to the two other chitinases, which can be considered as new basic pathogenesis-related proteins. These two basic chitinases exhibit higher molecular weights (32,000 and 34,000) and higher specific enzyme activity than the two acidic isoforms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.84.19.6750

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Legrand, M., Kauffmann, S., Geoffroy, P., & Fritig, B.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1987-10
Volume
84
Issue
19
Pages
6750-6754
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1992074806
Cited by
529
References
1
FWCI
11.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.