Cited by 261Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsCancer Treatment and PharmacologyCellular Mechanics and Interactions

Differential turnover of tyrosinated and detyrosinated microtubules

Open access
Webster, D R, Gundersen, G G, Bulinski, J C, Borisy, G G·1987·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Turnover of tyrosinated and detyrosinated microtubules ([Tyr]MTs and [Glu]MTs, respectively) was analyzed by the combined use of hapten-mediated immunocytochemistry and peptide-specific antibodies. Cells were microinjected with hapten-labeled tubulin and then processed for triple-label immunofluorescence to determine the pattern of incorporation of the injected subunits into [Tyr]- and [Glu]-MTs. Within 2 min of microinjection, hapten-labeled domains were present at the ends of virtually all [Tyr]MTs but were absent from most [Glu]MTs, demonstrating that [Tyr]MTs grew, whereas most [Glu]MTs did not. After 1 hr of incubation, all [Tyr]MTs analyzed were copolymers of endogenous and hapten-labeled subunits, indicating complete and rapid turnover of these MTs. However, the majority of [Glu]MTs were not hapten-labeled, indicating that they had not turned over. Even 16 hr after injection, cells that had not divided retained a small proportion of [Glu]MTs lacking hapten, implying that some had persisted for most of a cell generation. At mitosis, all MTs were hapten-labeled, indicating that the stable interphase [Glu]MTs had depolymerized. The results establish that the MT network is heterogeneous in its turnover rate, being composed of at least two populations: [Tyr]MTs that turn over rapidly and [Glu]MTs that turn over slowly.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.84.24.9040

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [7]McIntosh, J. R. (1985) in Aneuploidy: Etiology and Mechanisms, eds. Dellarco, V., Voytek, P. E. & Hollaender, A. (Plenum, New York), pp. 197–229.
  2. [8]Vandre, D. D., Kronebusch, P. & Borisy, G. G. (1984) in Molecular Biology of the Cytoskeleton, eds. Borisy, G. G., Cleveland, D. W. & Murphy, D. B. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY), pp. 1–16.
  3. [11]Theurkauf, W. E., Baum, H., Bo, J. & Wensink, P. C. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 8477–8481.
  4. [16]Vallee, R. B., Bloom, G. S. & Luca, F. C. (1984) in Molecular Biology of the Cytoskeleton, eds. Borisy, G. G., Cleveland, D. W. & Murphy, D. B. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY), pp. 111–130.
  5. [23]Thompson, W. C., Deanin, G. G. & Gordon, M. W. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 1318–1322.
  6. [37]Himes, R. H., Burton, P. R., Kersey, R. N. & Pierson, G. B. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73, 4397–4399.
  7. [38]Schliwa, M., Euteneuer, U., Bulinski, J. C. & Izant, J. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 1037–1041.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Webster, D. R., Gundersen, G. G., Bulinski, J. C., & Borisy, G. G.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1987-12
Volume
84
Issue
24
Pages
9040-9044
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2059667498
Cited by
261
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (GM‐25062)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA39755)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 25062, GM 10776)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
microtubule turnover, microtubule growth, microtubule depolymerization, mitosis, microtubule cytoskeleton
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Chlorocebus aethiops, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Microinjections, Microtubules, Mitosis, Spindle Apparatus, Tubulin, Tyrosine, Macromolecular Substances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review