The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of time-resolved and -unresolved measurements of deoxyhemoglobin in brain.
Open accessAbstract
Continuous (CW) and pulsed light were used for the noninvasive measurement of hemoglobin oxygenation in tissues. A dual wavelength method of continuous illumination spectroscopy used 760 nm (deoxyhemoglobin peak) and 800 nm (an oxyhemoglobin-deoxyhemoglobin isosbestic point) to measure the kinetics and extent of oxyhemoglobin deoxygenation in brains during mild ischemia/hypoxia. Absorption and scattering were modeled in an artificial milk/yeast blood system, which gave an exponential relationship between absorption and optical path length to a depth of 7 cm. Time-resolved spectroscopy (10-ps resolution) afforded a display of the times and distances of arrival of photons emitted by the cat brain in response to a 10-ps input pulse. The emitted photons rose to a peak in a fraction of a nanosecond and declined exponentially over a few nanoseconds. The half-time of exponential decay corresponds to photon migration over a distance of 4 cm. Exponential light emission continued for several more nanoseconds when the brain was encased by the skull, which plays a key role in prolonging light emission. The exponential decline of light intensity has a value [exp(-microL)], where L is the path length determined from the time/distance scale and mu is the characteristic of the migration of light in the brain. The factor mu is increased by increasing absorption, and mu' = epsilon C where epsilon and C are the Beer-Lambert parameters of extinction coefficient (epsilon) and concentration (C). Thus, deoxyhemoglobin can be quantified in brain tissues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ferrari, M., & Quaresima, V. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.049 · Cited by 2,274
HomER: A review of time-series analysis methods for near-infrared spectroscopy of the brain
Huppert, T. J., Diamond, S. G., Franceschini, M. A., & Boas, D. A. (2009) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.48.00d280 · Cited by 1,817
Spectroscopy and Imaging with Diffusing Light
Yodh, A., & Chance, B. (1995) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.881445 · Cited by 800
Self-citationQuantification in tissue near–infrared spectroscopy
Delpy, D. T., & Cope, M. (1997) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1997.0046 · Cited by 507
Doornbos, R. M. P., Lang, R., Aalders, M. C., Cross, F. W., & Sterenborg, H. J. C. M. (1999) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/44/4/012 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Chance, B., Leigh, J. S., Miyake, H., Smith, D. S., Nioka, S., Greenfeld, R., Finander, M., Kaufmann, K., Levy, W., & Young, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1988-07
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 4971-4975
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1995467519
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of time-resolved and -unresolved measurements of deoxyhemoglobin in brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.85.14.4971
- The paper
- Chance, B., Leigh, J. S., Miyake, H., Smith, D. S., Nioka, S., Greenfeld, R., Finander, M., Kaufmann, K., Levy, W., & Young, M. (1988). Comparison of time-resolved and -unresolved measurements of deoxyhemoglobin in brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.14.4971
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.