Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Human papillomavirus type 16 alters human epithelial cell differentiation in vitro

McCance, D J, Kopan, R, Fuchs, E, Laimins, L A·1988·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16, 18, 31, and 33 have been implicated as etiologic agents of cervical and penile cancer. Using a cell culture system for keratinocytes which allows stratification and production of differentiation-specific keratins, we have examined the effects of one of these viruses, HPV-16, on the differentiation capabilities of human epithelial cells. A plasmid containing the HPV-16 genome and a neomycin-selectable marker was transfected into primary human epidermal cells and SCC-13 cells, an immortalized squamous cell carcinoma cell line. Cloned neomycin-resistant cell lines were isolated and examined by cell culture on raised collagen rafts. Cell lines containing HPV-16 DNA retained the ability to stratify and express differentiation-specific keratins in the raft system but otherwise failed to differentiate normally. The histological abnormalities induced by HPV-16 closely resembled those seen in genital intraepithelial neoplasia in vivo. Hence, our results support the role of HPV-16 as an etiologic agent in the development of genital neoplasias and suggest a specific system for the study of HPV-16-induced epithelial cancers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.85.19.7169

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]Durst, M., Gissmann, L., Ikenberg, H. & zur Hausen, H. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 3812–3815.
  2. [19]Thomas, P. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 5201–5204. nieras, M. (1986) J. Invest. Dermatol. 86, 181–185.
  3. [21]Stoler, A., Kopan, R., Duvic, M. & Fuchs, E. (1988) J. Cell Biol. 107, in press.
  4. [30]Smotkin, D. & Wettstein, F. O. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 4680–4684.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
McCance, D. J., Kopan, R., Fuchs, E., & Laimins, L. A.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Chicago, IL 60637.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1988-10
Volume
85
Issue
19
Pages
7169-7173
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
265
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review