Cited by 120Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAmino Acid Enzymes and MetabolismCellular transport and secretion

Active transport of gamma-aminobutyric acid and glycine into synaptic vesicles

Open access
Kish, P E, Fischer-Bovenkerk, C, Ueda, T·1989·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Although gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glycine are recognized as major amino acid inhibitory neurotransmitters in the central nervous system, their storage is poorly understood. In this study we have characterized vesicular GABA and glycine uptakes in the cerebrum and spinal cord, respectively. We present evidence that GABA and glycine are each taken up into isolated synaptic vesicles in an ATP-dependent manner and that the uptake is driven by an electrochemical proton gradient. Uptake for both amino acids exhibited kinetics with low affinity (Km in the millimolar range) similar to vesicular glutamate uptake. The ATP-dependent GABA uptake was not inhibited by the putative amino acid neurotransmitters glycine, taurine, glutamate, or aspartate or by GABA analogs, agonists, and antagonists. Similarly, ATP-dependent glycine uptake was hardly affected by GABA, taurine, glutamate, or aspartate or by glycine analogs or antagonists. The GABA uptake was not affected by chloride, which is in contrast to the uptake of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate, whereas the glycine uptake was slightly stimulated by low concentrations of chloride. Tissue distribution studies indicate that the vesicular uptake systems for GABA, glycine, and glutamate are distributed in different proportions in the cerebrum and spinal cord. These results suggest that the vesicular uptake systems for GABA, glycine, and glutamate are distinct from each other.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3877

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kish, P. E., Fischer-Bovenkerk, C., & Ueda, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Mental Health Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1989-05
Volume
86
Issue
10
Pages
3877-3881
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2088408205
Cited by
119
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (5T32MHT5794-07)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
GABA, glycine, synaptic vesicles, vesicular uptake, inhibitory neurotransmitter, ATP-dependent uptake, proton gradient, cerebrum, spinal cord, chloride, amino acid transporters, neurotransmitter storage
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphatases, Animals, Biological Transport, Active, Brain, Chlorides, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Glutamates, Glycine, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Ionophores, Kinetics, Membrane Potentials, Spinal Cord, Structure-Activity Relationship, Synaptic Vesicles, Tissue Distribution, Neurotransmitter Agents, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review