The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Blood-brain barrier transport of cationized immunoglobulin G: enhanced delivery compared to native protein.
Open accessAbstract
IgG molecules are potential neuropharmaceuticals that may be used for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes. However, IgG molecules are excluded from entering brain, owing to a lack of transport of these plasma proteins through the brain capillary wall, or blood-brain barrier (BBB). The possibility of enhanced IgG delivery through the BBB by cationization of the proteins was explored in the present studies. Native bovine IgG molecules were cationized by covalent coupling of hexamethylenediamine and the isoelectric point was raised to greater than 10.7 based on isoelectric focusing studies. Native and cationized IgG molecules were radiolabeled with 125I and chloramine T. Cationized IgG, but not native IgG, was rapidly taken up by isolated bovine brain microvessels, which were used as an in vitro model system of the BBB. Cationized IgG binding was time and temperature dependent and was saturated by increasing concentrations of unlabeled cationized IgG (dissociation constant of the high-affinity binding site, 0.90 +/- 0.37 microM; Bmax, 1.4 +/- 0.4 nmol per mg of protein). In vivo studies documented enhanced brain uptake of 125I-labeled cationized IgG relative to [3H]albumin, and complete transcytosis of the 125I-labeled cationized IgG molecule through the BBB and into brain parenchyma was demonstrated by thaw-mount autoradiography of frozen sections of rat brain obtained after carotid arterial infusions of 125I-labeled cationized IgG. These studies demonstrate that cationization of IgG molecules greatly facilitates the transport of these plasma proteins through the BBB in vivo, and this process may provide a new strategy for IgG delivery through the BBB.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effects of Charge on Antibody Tissue Distribution and Pharmacokinetics
Boswell, C. A., Tesar, D. B., Mukhyala, K., Theil, F.-P., Fielder, P. J., & Khawli, L. A. (2010) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/bc100261d · Cited by 398
Macromolecular permeability across the blood-nerve and blood-brain barriers.
Poduslo, J. F., Curran, G. L., & Berg, C. T. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.12.5705 · Cited by 377
Delivery of peptide and protein drugs over the blood–brain barrier
Brasnjevic, I., Steinbusch, H. W. M., Schmitz, C., & Martinez-Martinez, P. (2009) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.12.002 · Cited by 279
Nanomedicine in the diagnosis and therapy of neurodegenerative disorders
Kabanov, A. V., & Gendelman, H. E. (2007) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.014 · Cited by 277
A Historical Review of Brain Drug Delivery
Pardridge, W. M. (2022) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14061283 · Cited by 219
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Triguero, D., Buciak, J. B., Yang, J., & Pardridge, W. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1989-06
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4761-4765
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2003931073
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood-brain barrier transport of cationized immunoglobulin G: enhanced delivery compared to native protein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.86.12.4761
- The paper
- Triguero, D., Buciak, J. B., Yang, J., & Pardridge, W. M. (1989). Blood-brain barrier transport of cationized immunoglobulin G: enhanced delivery compared to native protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.12.4761
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.