Cited by 209Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Dopamine D2 receptors in the cerebral cortex: Distribution and pharmacological characterization with [3H]raclopride

Open access
Lidow, M S, Goldman-Rakic, P S, Rakic, P, Innis, R B·1989·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

An apparent involvement of dopamine in the regulation of cognitive functions and the recognition of a widespread dopaminergic innervation of the cortex have focused attention on the identity of cortical dopamine receptors. However, only the presence and distribution of dopamine D1 receptors in the cortex have been well documented. Comparable information on cortical D2 sites is lacking. We report here the results of binding studies in the cortex and neostriatum of rat and monkey using the D2 selective antagonist [3H]raclopride. In both structures [3H]raclopride bound in a sodium-dependent and saturable manner to a single population of sites with pharmacological profiles of dopamine D2 receptors. D2 sites were present in all regions of the cortex, although their density was much lower than in the neostriatum. The density of these sites in both monkey and, to a lesser extent, rat cortex displayed a rostral-caudal gradient with highest concentrations in the prefrontal and lowest concentrations in the occipital cortex, corresponding to dopamine levels in these areas. Thus, the present study establishes the presence and widespread distribution of dopamine D2 receptors in the cortex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6412

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • D2 receptors are less prevalent in monkey dorsolateral PFC and are concentrated on layer V neurons, the layer that projects to striatum and the superior colliculus.

    “The D2 receptors are less prevalent in monkey dorsolateral PFC and are concentrated on layer V neurons, the layer that projects to striatum and the superior colliculus (98,122,123).”

    From Catecholamine Influences on Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortical Networks (2011) · cites this paper as [122]

    The Discussion reports that D2 binding sites are considerably less concentrated in primate cortex than in the neostriatum, and the Results report binding in monkey prefrontal cortex. The paper does not establish that receptors are concentrated on layer V neurons or identify layer V projections to the striatum and superior colliculus; it measures binding by cortical region, not neuronal layer. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [8]Palacios, J. M. & Pazos, A. (1987) in Dopamine Receptors, eds. Creese, I. & Fraser, C. M. (Liss, New York), pp. 175–197.
  2. [9]Lidow, M. S., Goldman-Rakic, P. S., Gallager, D. W., Geschwind, D. & Rakic, P. (1989) Neuroscience, in press.
  3. [31]Jenner, P., Theodorou, A. & Marsden, C. D. (1982) in The Benzamides: Pharmacology, Neurobiology and Chemical Aspects, eds. Rotrosen, J. & Stanley, M. (Raven, New York), pp. 109-141.
  4. [36]Sesack, S. R. & Bunney, B. S. (1987) Proc. Soc. Neurosci. (Abstr.) 13, 2529.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lidow, M. S., Goldman-Rakic, P. S., Rakic, P., & Innis, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Section of Neuroanatomy, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1989-08
Volume
86
Issue
16
Pages
6412-6416
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1983358193
Cited by
209
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
dopamine D2 receptor, cerebral cortex, receptor distribution, neostriatum, dopamine receptor density, rostral-caudal gradient, prefrontal cortex, occipital cortex, dopamine levels, rats, monkeys, cognitive function
MeSH terms
Animals, Binding, Competitive, Calcium, Cerebral Cortex, Corpus Striatum, Female, Kinetics, Macaca mulatta, Magnesium, Male, Rats, Inbred Strains, Receptors, Dopamine, Receptors, Cell Surface, Salicylamides, Sodium, Thermodynamics, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Raclopride, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review