The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A single clone of Staphylococcus aureus causes the majority of cases of toxic shock syndrome.
Open accessAbstract
Genetic relationships among 315 isolates of the bacterium Staphylococcus aureus expressing toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1) recovered primarily from humans with toxic shock syndrome (TSS) in five countries on two continents were determined by analyzing electrophoretically demonstrable allelic variation at 20 chromosomal enzyme loci. Forty-nine distinctive electrophoretic types (ETs), representing multilocus enzyme genotypes, were identified. Cluster analysis of the ETs revealed two major phylogenetic divisions separated at a genetic distance of 0.35 and seven branches diverging from one another at distances greater than or equal to 0.20. A single clone (ET 41) accounted for 88% of cases of TSS with a female urogenital focus and 53% of TSS cases involving nonurogenital (predominantly wound) infections. With few exceptions, strains representing different phylogenetic lines had characteristic TSST-1 gene (tst) restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns obtained by digestion of genomic DNA with Cla I. Strains recovered from ovine and bovine hosts with mastitis were genotypically distinct from the major human TSS clone. The expression of TSST-1 in cell lineages representing the total breadth of multilocus genotypic diversity in the species S. aureus as a whole is interpreted as evidence that the TSST-1 gene is evolutionarily old. The recovery of a single clone from the majority of individuals afflicted with TSS having a urogenital focus and from the genital tract of a large proportion of asymptomatic female carriers strongly suggests that this clone is especially well adapted for colonization of these anatomic sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tong, S. Y. C., Davis, J. S., Eichenberger, E., Holland, T. L., & Fowler, V. G. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00134-14 · Cited by 5,192
Update on clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci
Kloos, W. E., & Bannerman, T. L. (1994) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.7.1.117 · Cited by 835
Dermal adipocytes protect against invasive Staphylococcus aureus skin infection
Zhang, L.-J., Guerrero-Juarez, C. F., Hata, T., Bapat, S. P., Ramos, R., Plikus, M. V., & Gallo, R. L. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1260972 · Cited by 471
Molecular typing of Staphylococcus aureus on the basis of coagulase gene polymorphisms
Goh, S. H., Byrne, S. K., Zhang, J. L., & Chow, A. W. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.30.7.1642-1645.1992 · Cited by 306
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Musser, J. M., Schlievert, P. M., Chow, A. W., Ewan, P., Kreiswirth, B. N., Rosdahl, V. T., Naidu, A. S., Witte, W., & Selander, R. K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 225-229
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2032043692
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A single clone of Staphylococcus aureus causes the majority of cases of toxic shock syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.87.1.225
- The paper
- Musser, J. M., Schlievert, P. M., Chow, A. W., Ewan, P., Kreiswirth, B. N., Rosdahl, V. T., Naidu, A. S., Witte, W., & Selander, R. K. (1990). A single clone of Staphylococcus aureus causes the majority of cases of toxic shock syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.1.225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.