The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Peptides on phage: a vast library of peptides for identifying ligands.
Open accessAbstract
We have constructed a vast library of peptides for finding compounds that bind to antibodies and other receptors. Millions of different hexapeptides were expressed at the N terminus of the adsorption protein (pIII) of fd phage. The vector fAFF1, derived from the tetracycline resistance-transducing vector fd-tet, allows cloning of oligonucleotides in a variety of locations in the 5' region of gene III. A library of 3 x 10(8) recombinants was generated by cloning randomly synthesized oligonucleotides. The library was screened for high-avidity binding to a monoclonal antibody (3-E7) that is specific for the N terminus of beta-endorphin (Tyr-Gly-Gly-Phe). Fifty-one clones selected by three rounds of the affinity purification technique called panning were sequenced and found to differ from previously known ligands for this antibody. The striking finding is that all 51 contained tyrosine as the N-terminal residue and that 48 contained glycine as the second residue. The binding affinities of six chemically synthesized hexapeptides from this set range from 0.35 microM (Tyr-Gly-Phe-Trp-Gly-Met) to 8.3 microM (Tyr-Ala-Gly-Phe-Ala-Gln), compared with 7.1 nM for a known high-affinity ligand (Tyr-Gly-Gly-Phe-Leu). These results show that ligands can be identified with no prior information concerning antibody specificity. Peptide libraries are also likely to be useful in finding ligands that bind to other classes of receptors and in discovering pharmacologic agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Making antibodies by phage display technology
Winter, G., Griffiths, A. D., Hawkins, R. E., & Hoogenboom, H. R. (1994) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.iy.12.040194.002245 · Cited by 1,573
Hoogenboom, H. R., Griffiths, A. D., Johnson, K. S., Chiswell, D. J., Hudson, P., & Winter, G. (1991) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/19.15.4133 · Cited by 1,020
Encoded combinatorial chemistry.
Brenner, S., & Lerner, R. A. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.12.5381 · Cited by 1,014
Schatz, P. J. (1993) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1093-1138 · Cited by 580
Daniels, D. A., Chen, H., Hicke, B. J., Swiderek, K. M., & Gold, L. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2136683100 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Cwirla, S. E., Peters, E. A., Barrett, R. W., & Dower, W. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1990-08
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 6378-6382
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2084429764
- Cited by
- 928
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peptides on phage: a vast library of peptides for identifying ligands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.87.16.6378
- The paper
- Cwirla, S. E., Peters, E. A., Barrett, R. W., & Dower, W. J. (1990). Peptides on phage: a vast library of peptides for identifying ligands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.16.6378
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.