The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Theory for protein mutability and biogenesis.
Open accessAbstract
Using an elementary physical model for protein folding, of self-avoiding short copolymer chains on two-dimensional square lattices, we address two questions regarding the evolution and origins of globular proteins. (i) How will protein native structures and stabilities be affected by single-and double-site mutations? (ii) What is the probability that a randomly chosen sequence of amino acids will be compact and globular under folding conditions? For a large number of different sequences, we search the conformational space exhaustively to find unequivocally the "native" conformation(s), of global minimum free energy, for each sequence. We find that replacing nonpolar residues in the core by polar residues is generally destabilizing, that surface sites are less sensitive than core sites, that some mutations increase the degeneracy of native states, and that overall it is most probable that a mutation will be neutral, having no effect on the native structure. These results support a "Continuity Principle," that small changes in sequence seldom have large effects on structure or stability of the native state. The simulations also show that (i) the number of "convergent" sequences (different sequences coding for the same native structure) is extremely large and (ii) most sequences become quite dense under folding conditions. This implies that the probability of formation of a globular protein from a random sequence of amino acids by prebiotic or mutational methods is significantly greater than zero.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis
Bryngelson, J. D., Onuchic, J. N., Socci, N. D., & Wolynes, P. G. (1995) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340210302 · Cited by 2,648
Principles of protein folding — A perspective from simple exact models
Dill, K. A., Bromberg, S., Yue, K., Chan, H. S., Fiebig, K. M., Yee, D. P., & Thomas, P. D. (1995) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5560040401 · Cited by 1,525
Self-citationProtein Design by Binary Patterning of Polar and Nonpolar Amino Acids
Kamtekar, S., Schiffer, J. M., Xiong, H., Babik, J. M., & Hecht, M. H. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8259512 · Cited by 730
Unusual biophysics of intrinsically disordered proteins
Uversky, V. N. (2013) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2012.12.008 · Cited by 566
Genetic Algorithms for Protein Folding Simulations
Unger, R., & Moult, J. (1993) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1993.1258 · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- Lau, K. F., & Dill, K. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 638-642
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1999669514
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory for protein mutability and biogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.87.2.638
- The paper
- Lau, K. F., & Dill, K. A. (1990). Theory for protein mutability and biogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.2.638
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.