The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cell line-specific differences in the control of cell cycle progression in the absence of mitosis.
Open accessAbstract
This paper reports that there are major differences between mammalian cell lines in the propensity to progress into subsequent cell cycles when mitosis is inhibited with agents that disrupt the assembly of the mitotic spindle apparatus (Colcemid, nocodazole, and taxol). Human HeLa S3 cells, which represent one extreme, remain arrested in mitosis, with elevated levels of cyclin B and p34cdc2 kinase activity. In Chinese hamster ovary cells, at the other extreme, the periodic rise and fall of cyclin B levels and p34cdc2 kinase activity is only transiently inhibited in the absence of mitosis. The cells progress into subsequent cell cycles, without dividing, resulting in serial doublings of cellular DNA content. In general, the propensity to progress into subsequent cell cycles in the absence of mitosis appears to be species related, such that human cell lines remain permanently blocked in a mitotic state, whereas rodent cell lines are only transiently inhibited when spindle assembly is disrupted. We interpret these results to indicate that in mammalian cell lines there exists a checkpoint which serves to couple cell cycle progression to the completion of certain karyokinetic events. Furthermore, either such a checkpoint exists in some cell lines but not in others or the stringency of the control mechanism varies among different cell lines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Uncoupling of S phase and mitosis induced by anticancer agents in cells lacking p21
Waldman, T., Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381713a0 · Cited by 728
Ann Jordan, M., Thrower, D., & Wilson, L. (1992) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.102.3.401 · Cited by 531
Rieder, C. L., Schultz, A., Cole, R., & Sluder, G. (1994) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.127.5.1301 · Cited by 508
The role of iron in cell cycle progression and the proliferation of neoplastic cells
Le, N. (2002) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0304-419x(02)00068-9 · Cited by 453
Oncoprotein 18 is a phosphorylation-responsive regulator of microtubule dynamics.
Marklund, U., Larsson, N., Gradin, H. M., Brattsand, G., & Gullberg, M. (1996) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00914.x · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Kung, A. L., Sherwood, S. W., & Schimke, R. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 9553-9557
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2085815176
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell line-specific differences in the control of cell cycle progression in the absence of mitosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.87.24.9553
- The paper
- Kung, A. L., Sherwood, S. W., & Schimke, R. T. (1990). Cell line-specific differences in the control of cell cycle progression in the absence of mitosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.24.9553
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.