The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle.
Open accessAbstract
To test the popular but unproven assumption that the metaphase-anaphase transition in vertebrate somatic cells is subject to a checkpoint that monitors chromosome (i.e., kinetochore) attachment to the spindle, we filmed mitosis in 126 PtK1 cells. We found that the time from nuclear envelope breakdown to anaphase onset is linearly related (r2 = 0.85) to the duration the cell has unattached kinetochores, and that even a single unattached kinetochore delays anaphase onset. We also found that anaphase is initiated at a relatively constant 23-min average interval after the last kinetochore attaches, regardless of how long the cell possessed unattached kinetochores. From these results we conclude that vertebrate somatic cells possess a metaphase-anaphase checkpoint control that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. We also found that some cells treated with 0.3-0.75 nM Taxol, after the last kinetochore attached to the spindle, entered anaphase and completed normal poleward chromosome motion (anaphase A) up to 3 h after the treatment--well beyond the 9-48-min range exhibited by untreated cells. The fact that spindle bipolarity and the metaphase alignment of kinetochores are maintained in these cells, and that the chromosomes move poleward during anaphase, suggests that the checkpoint monitors more than just the attachment of microtubules at sister kinetochores or the metaphase alignment of chromosomes. Our data are most consistent with the hypothesis that the checkpoint monitors an increase in tension between kinetochores and their associated microtubules as biorientation occurs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Checkpoints: Controls That Ensure the Order of Cell Cycle Events
Hartwell, L. H., & Weinert, T. A. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2683079 · Cited by 3,021
Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast
Li, R., & Murray, A. W. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5 · Cited by 1,174
S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function
Hoyt, M. A., Totis, L., & Roberts, B. T. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3 · Cited by 1,131
Mechanism of mitotic block and inhibition of cell proliferation by taxol at low concentrations.
Jordan, M. A., Toso, R. J., Thrower, D., & Wilson, L. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.20.9552 · Cited by 1,095
Creative blocks: cell-cycle checkpoints and feedback controls
Murray, A. W. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/359599a0 · Cited by 663
Mechanism of inhibition of cell proliferation by Vinca alkaloids.
Jordan, M. A., Thrower, D., & Wilson, L. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 534
Ann Jordan, M., Thrower, D., & Wilson, L. (1992) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.102.3.401 · Cited by 531
Skibbens, R., Skeen, V., & Salmon, E. (1993) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.122.4.859 · Cited by 403
Rieder, C., & Salmon, E. (1994) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.124.3.223 · Cited by 292
Self-citationHunt, T., Luca, F. C., & Ruderman, J. V. (1992) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.116.3.707 · Cited by 236
Cited by
Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs
Jordan, M. A., & Wilson, L. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1317 · Cited by 4,000
The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time
Musacchio, A., & Salmon, E. D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2163 · Cited by 2,227
The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy
Peters, J.-M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1988 · Cited by 1,315
The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Lara-Gonzalez, P., Westhorpe, F. G., & Taylor, S. S. (2012) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.006 · Cited by 773
Weiss, E., & Winey, M. (1996) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.132.1.111 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Rieder, C. L., Schultz, A., Cole, R., & Sluder, G.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1994-12-01
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1301-1310
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2126683450
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 11.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.127.5.1301
- The paper
- Rieder, C. L., Schultz, A., Cole, R., & Sluder, G. (1994). Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.127.5.1301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.