The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods for assessing the statistical significance of molecular sequence features by using general scoring schemes.
Open accessAbstract
An unusual pattern in a nucleic acid or protein sequence or a region of strong similarity shared by two or more sequences may have biological significance. It is therefore desirable to know whether such a pattern can have arisen simply by chance. To identify interesting sequence patterns, appropriate scoring values can be assigned to the individual residues of a single sequence or to sets of residues when several sequences are compared. For single sequences, such scores can reflect biophysical properties such as charge, volume, hydrophobicity, or secondary structure potential; for multiple sequences, they can reflect nucleotide or amino acid similarity measured in a wide variety of ways. Using an appropriate random model, we present a theory that provides precise numerical formulas for assessing the statistical significance of any region with high aggregate score. A second class of results describes the composition of high-scoring segments. In certain contexts, these permit the choice of scoring systems which are "optimal" for distinguishing biologically relevant patterns. Examples are given of applications of the theory to a variety of protein sequences, highlighting segments with unusual biological features. These include distinctive charge regions in transcription factors and protooncogene products, pronounced hydrophobic segments in various receptor and transport proteins, and statistically significant subalignments involving the recently characterized cystic fibrosis gene.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Needleman, S. B., & Wunsch, C. D. (1970) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4 · Cited by 11,288
Identification of the Cystic Fibrosis Gene: Cloning and Characterization of Complementary DNA
Riordan, J. R., Rommens, J. M., Kerem, B.-S., Alon, N., Rozmahel, R., Grzelczak, Z., Zielenski, J., Lok, S., Plavsic, N., Chou, J.-L., et al. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2475911 · Cited by 7,418
Rapid similarity searches of nucleic acid and protein data banks.
Wilbur, W. J., & Lipman, D. J. (1983) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.80.3.726 · Cited by 1,546
Cited by
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Self-citationGapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Self-citationFast and effective prediction of microRNA/target duplexes
REHMSMEIER, M., STEFFEN, P., HÖCHSMANN, M., & GIEGERICH, R. (2004) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.5248604 · Cited by 2,560
Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry
Keiser, M. J., Roth, B. L., Armbruster, B. N., Ernsberger, P., Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1284 · Cited by 2,402
Miranda, K. C., Huynh, T., Tay, Y., Ang, Y.-S., Tam, W.-L., Thomson, A. M., Lim, B., & Rigoutsos, I. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.031 · Cited by 2,063
Metadata
- Authors
- Karlin, S., & Altschul, S. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2264-2268
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2094519647
- Cited by
- 1,535
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods for assessing the statistical significance of molecular sequence features by using general scoring schemes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.87.6.2264
- The paper
- Karlin, S., & Altschul, S. F. (1990). Methods for assessing the statistical significance of molecular sequence features by using general scoring schemes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.6.2264
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.