Cited by 406Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisMathematical Biology Tumor GrowthCancer-related Molecular Pathways

A minimal cascade model for the mitotic oscillator involving cyclin and cdc2 kinase.

Open access
Goldbeter, A·1991·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A minimal model for the mitotic oscillator is presented. The model, built on recent experimental advances, is based on the cascade of post-translational modification that modulates the activity of cdc2 kinase during the cell cycle. The model pertains to the situation encountered in early amphibian embryos, where the accumulation of cyclin suffices to trigger the onset of mitosis. In the first cycle of the bicyclic cascade model, cyclin promotes the activation of cdc2 kinase through reversible dephosphorylation, and in the second cycle, cdc2 kinase activates a cyclin protease by reversible phosphorylation. That cyclin activates cdc2 kinase while the kinase triggers the degradation of cyclin has suggested that oscillations may originate from such a negative feedback loop [Félix, M. A., Labbé, J. C., Dorée, M., Hunt, T. & Karsenti, E. (1990) Nature (London) 346, 379-382]. This conjecture is corroborated by the model, which indicates that sustained oscillations of the limit cycle type can arise in the cascade, provided that a threshold exists in the activation of cdc2 kinase by cyclin and in the activation of cyclin proteolysis by cdc2 kinase. The analysis shows how miototic oscillations may readily arise from time lags associated with these thresholds and from the delayed negative feedback provided by cdc2-induced cyclin degradation. A mechanism for the origin of the thresholds is proposed in terms of the phenomenon of zero-order ultrasensitivity previously described for biochemical systems regulated by covalent modification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.88.20.9107

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By examining 17 models from the systems biology literature, the paper showed that their parameter sensitivities all share striking common features deemed "sloppiness".

    “By examining 17 models from the systems biology literature [2,21,25,28–41], we showed that their parameter sensitivities all share striking common features deemed “sloppiness””

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldbeter, A.
Affiliations
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Corresponding author
Goldbeter, A
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1991-10-15
Volume
88
Issue
20
Pages
9107-9111
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2069076431
Cited by
406
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 25
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
cell cycle regulation, cdc2 kinase, cyclins, negative feedback loop, limit cycle oscillations, threshold dynamics, amphibian embryos, dephosphorylation, phosphorylation, time delay
MeSH terms
Cell Cycle, Kinetics, Mathematics, Mitosis, Models, Biological, Time Factors, CDC2 Protein Kinase, Cyclins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review