The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modification of the coding sequence enhances plant expression of insect control protein genes.
Open accessAbstract
Increased expression of the insect control protein genes of Bacillus thuringiensis in plants has been critical to the development of genetically improved plants with agronomically acceptable levels of insect resistance. The expression of the cryIA(b) gene was compared to partially modified (3% nucleotide difference) and to fully modified (21% nucleotide difference) cryIA(b) and cryIA(c) genes in tobacco and tomato. The modified genes increased the frequency of plants that produced the proteins at quantities sufficient to control insects and dramatically increased the levels of these proteins. Among the most highly expressing transformed plants for each gene, the plants with the partially modified cryIA(b) gene had a 10-fold higher level of insect control protein and plants with the fully modified cryIA(b) had a 100-fold higher level of CryIA(b) protein compared with the wild-type gene. Similar results were obtained with the fully modified cryIA(c) gene in plants. Specific sequences of the partially modified cryIA(b) gene were analyzed for their ability to affect cryIA(b) gene expression in tobacco. The DNA sequence of a single region was identified as important to the improvement of plant expression of the cryIA(b) gene. The increased levels of cryIA(b) mRNA were not directly proportional to the increased levels of CryIA(b) protein in plants transformed with the modified cryIA(b) genes, indicating that the nucleotide sequence of these genes had an effect in improving their translational efficiency in plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sustainability of Transgenic Insecticidal Cultivars: Integrating Pest Genetics and Ecology
Gould, F. (1998) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.701 · Cited by 1,392
Codon bias and heterologous protein expression
Gustafsson, C., Govindarajan, S., & Minshull, J. (2004) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.04.006 · Cited by 1,330
Koziel, M. G., Beland, G. L., Bowman, C., Carozzi, N. B., Crenshaw, R., Crossland, L., Dawson, J., Desai, N., Hill, M., Kadwell, S., et al. (1993) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0293-194 · Cited by 849
Economic, Ecological, Food Safety, and Social Consequences of the Deployment of Bt Transgenic Plants
Shelton, A. M., Zhao, J.-Z., & Roush, R. T. (2002) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145309 · Cited by 794
Crystal structure of insecticidal δ-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis at 2.5 Å resolution
Li, J., Carroll, J., & Ellar, D. J. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/353815a0 · Cited by 745
Metadata
- Authors
- Perlak, F. J., Fuchs, R. L., Dean, D. A., McPherson, S. L., & Fischhoff, D. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1991-04-15
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3324-3328
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2085939537
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modification of the coding sequence enhances plant expression of insect control protein genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.88.8.3324
- The paper
- Perlak, F. J., Fuchs, R. L., Dean, D. A., McPherson, S. L., & Fischhoff, D. A. (1991). Modification of the coding sequence enhances plant expression of insect control protein genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.8.3324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.