The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differential expression of c-fos and zif268 in rat striatum after haloperidol, clozapine, and amphetamine.
Open accessAbstract
Antipsychotic drugs are monoamine receptor antagonists. However, the mechanisms by which these direct actions are translated into therapeutic effects are unknown. Candidate mechanisms include receptor-mediated regulation of gene expression in target neurons. Inducible transcription factors, including certain immediate early genes (IEGs), may mediate between receptor-activated second messenger systems and expression of genes involved in the differentiated functions of neurons. We examined the specificity of induction of the IEGs c-fos and zif268 after acute administration of several antipsychotic drugs and, for comparison, the stimulant amphetamine, which has pharmacologic effects relatively opposite to those of antipsychotics. Antipsychotic drugs with potent dopamine D2 receptor antagonist properties, such as haloperidol, induced both c-fos and zif268 mRNA in the caudate-putamen; however, the atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine induced zif268 but not c-fos mRNA in that region. Similarly, haloperidol, but not clozapine, induced c-Fos-like immunoreactivity in the caudate-putamen. In contrast, both drugs induced c-Fos-like immunoreactivity in the nucleus accumbens. Like haloperidol, amphetamine induced both c-fos and zif268 mRNA in the caudate-putamen, but the anatomic patterns of induction of c-Fos-like immunoreactivity by the two drugs were dramatically different. Haloperidol and amphetamine induced AP-1 binding activity in cell extracts from the caudate-putamen, indicating that drug-induced IEG expression results in protein products that may function in the regulation of target gene expression. Thus these data demonstrate that inductions of IEG expression by haloperidol, clozapine, and amphetamine are specific, may be biologically relevant, and suggest avenues for further investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dopamine receptors: from structure to function
MISSALE, C., NASH, S. R., ROBINSON, S. W., JABER, M., & CARON, M. G. (1998) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1998.78.1.189 · Cited by 3,633
Fredholm, B. B., Bättig, K., Holmén, J., Nehlig, A., & Zvartau, E. E. (1999) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01396-6 · Cited by 2,624
Pattern and time course of immediate early gene expression in rat brain following acute stress
Cullinan, W. E., Herman, J. P., Battaglia, D. F., Akil, H., & Watson, S. J. (1995) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(94)00355-9 · Cited by 1,056
Initiation and adaptation: a paradigm for understanding psychotropic drug action
(1996) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.153.2.151 · Cited by 490
Neurobiology of Dopamine in Schizophrenia
Guillin, O., Abi‐Dargham, A., & Laruelle, M. (2007) · International Review of Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7742(06)78001-1 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Nguyen, T. V., Kosofsky, B. E., Birnbaum, R., Cohen, B. M., & Hyman, S. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1992-05-15
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4270-4274
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2054228210
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential expression of c-fos and zif268 in rat striatum after haloperidol, clozapine, and amphetamine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.89.10.4270
- The paper
- Nguyen, T. V., Kosofsky, B. E., Birnbaum, R., Cohen, B. M., & Hyman, S. E. (1992). Differential expression of c-fos and zif268 in rat striatum after haloperidol, clozapine, and amphetamine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.10.4270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.