The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Primary structures of chicken cone visual pigments: vertebrate rhodopsins have evolved out of cone visual pigments.
Open accessAbstract
The chicken retina contains rhodopsin (a rod visual pigment) and four kinds of cone visual pigments. The primary structures of chicken red (iodopsin) and rhodopsin have been determined previously. Here we report isolation of three cDNA clones encoding additional pigments from a chicken retinal cDNA library. Based on the partial amino acid sequences of the purified chicken visual pigments together with their biochemical and spectral properties, we have identified these clones as encoding the chicken green, blue, and violet visual pigments. Chicken violet was very similar to human blue not only in absorption maximum (chicken violet, 415 nm; human blue, 419 nm) but also in amino acid sequence (80.6% identical). Interestingly, chicken green was more similar (71-75.1%) than any other known cone pigment (42.0-53.7%) to vertebrate rhodopsins. The fourth additional cone pigment, chicken blue, had relatively low similarity (39.3-54.6%) in amino acid sequence to those of the other vertebrate visual pigments. A phylogenetic tree of vertebrate visual pigments constructed on the basis of amino acid identity indicated that an ancestral visual pigment evolved first into four groups (groups L, S, M1, and M2), each of which includes one of the chicken cone pigments, and that group Rh including vertebrate rhodopsins diverged from group M2 later. Thus, it is suggested that the gene for scotopic vision (rhodopsin) has evolved out of that for photopic vision (cone pigments). The divergence of rhodopsin from cone pigments was accompanied by an increase in negative net charge of the pigment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Molecular Basis of Visual Excitation
WALD, G. (1968) · Nature · doi:10.1038/219800a0 · Cited by 824
Cited by
The Major Cell Populations of the Mouse Retina
Jeon, C.-J., Strettoi, E., & Masland, R. H. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-21-08936.1998 · Cited by 1,429
The Types of Retinal Ganglion Cells: Current Status and Implications for Neuronal Classification
Sanes, J. R., & Masland, R. H. (2015) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071714-034120 · Cited by 789
Molecular evolution of vertebrate visual pigments
Yokoyama, S. (2000) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/s1350-9462(00)00002-1 · Cited by 586
IMI – Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia
Troilo, D., Smith, E. L., Nickla, D. L., Ashby, R., Tkatchenko, A. V., Ostrin, L. A., Gawne, T. J., Pardue, M. T., Summers, J. A., Kee, C.-S., et al. (2019) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25967 · Cited by 487
Evolution of the vertebrate eye: Opsins, photoreceptors, retina and eye cup
Lamb, T. D., Collin, S. P., & Pugh, E. N. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2283 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- Okano, T., Kojima, D., Fukada, Y., Shichida, Y., & Yoshizawa, T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5932-5936
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2116835232
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary structures of chicken cone visual pigments: vertebrate rhodopsins have evolved out of cone visual pigments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.89.13.5932
- The paper
- Okano, T., Kojima, D., Fukada, Y., Shichida, Y., & Yoshizawa, T. (1992). Primary structures of chicken cone visual pigments: vertebrate rhodopsins have evolved out of cone visual pigments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.13.5932
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.