Unequal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase error rates with RNA and DNA templates
Open accessAbstract
Sequence variation in the type 1 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) results, in part, from inaccurate replication by reverse transcriptase. Although this enzyme is error-prone during synthesis in vitro with DNA templates, the fidelity of RNA-dependent DNA synthesis relevant to minus-strand replication in the virus life cycle has not been examined extensively. In the present study, we have developed a system to determine the fidelity of transcription and reverse transcription and have used it to compare the fidelity of DNA synthesis by the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase with RNA and DNA templates of the same sequence. Overall, fidelity was several-fold higher with RNA than with DNA. Sequence analysis of mutants generated with the two substrates revealed that differences in error rates were substantial for specific errors. Fidelity with RNA was greater than 10-fold higher for substitution and minus-one nucleotide errors at five different homopolymeric positions. Because such errors likely result from template-primer slippage, this result suggests that misaligned intermediates are formed and/or used less frequently with an RNA template-DNA primer than with a DNA template-DNA primer. The results also suggest that HIV-1 reverse transcriptase synthesis with an RNA template-DNA primer was error-prone during incorporation of the first two nucleotides, perhaps due to aberrant enzyme-substrate interactions as synthesis initiates. The unequal error rates with RNA and DNA templates suggest that mistakes during minus- and plus-strand DNA synthesis may not contribute equally to the mutation rate of HIV-1. The data also provide estimates of substitution and frameshift error rates during transcription by T7 RNA polymerase.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In assays of RNA-dependent DNA synthesis, there is no significant difference in mutation rates among AMV, MLV, and HIV-1 RTs.
“Interestingly, assays designed to read mutations during RNA-dependent DNA synthesis reveal no significant difference in mutation rates among AMV, MLV, and HIV-1 RTs, indicating that HIV-1 RT’s misincorporation rate is higher during DNA-dependent DNA synthesis (Roberts et al. 1988, Boyer et al. 1992, Ji and Loeb 1992, Yu and Goodman 1992, Bakhanashvili and Hizi 1993, Kerr and Anderson 1997).”
From Beyond reverse transcription: molecular mechanisms and emerging paradigms in retroviral replication (2026) · cites this paper as Boyer et al. 1992
Cites
Frameshift Mutations and the Genetic Code
Streisinger, G., Okada, Y., Emrich, J., Newton, J., Tsugita, A., Terzaghi, E., & Inouye, M. (1966) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.014 · Cited by 1,400 · see citing works
Misalignment-mediated DNA synthesis errors
Kunkel, T. A. (1990) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00487a001 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Self-citationFidelity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase copying RNA in vitro
Ji, J., & Loeb, L. A. (1992) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00119a002 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Das, K., Martinez, S. E., Bandwar, R. P., & Arnold, E. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku487 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Beyond reverse transcription: molecular mechanisms and emerging paradigms in retroviral replication
Jehad, M. A., Ali, L. M., Pillai, V. N., Prabhu, S. G., Mustafa, F., & Rizvi, T. A. (2026) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuaf066 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“…difference in mutation rates among AMV, MLV, and HIV-1 RTs, indicating that HIV-1 RT’s misincorporation rate is higher during DNA-dependent DNA synthesis (Roberts et al. 1988 , Boyer et al. 1992 , Ji and Loeb 1992 , Yu and Goodman 1992 , Bakhanashvili and Hizi 1993 , Kerr and Anderson 1997 ).”
- Authors
- Boyer, J. C., Bebenek, K., & Kunkel, T. A.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 6919-6923
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC49616
- OpenAlex
- W1975173424
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, error rate, RNA-dependent DNA synthesis, substitution errors, T7 RNA polymerase, transcriptional fidelity, mutation rate
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, DNA Replication, DNA, Viral, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Avian Myeloblastosis Virus, Recombinant Proteins, RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, RNA, Viral, Templates, Genetic, Transcription, Genetic, Genetic Variation, HIV-1, Frameshift Mutation, HIV Reverse Transcriptase
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review