The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Activation of estrogen receptor transfected into a receptor-negative breast cancer cell line decreases the metastatic and invasive potential of the cells.
Open accessAbstract
Breast cancers containing estrogen receptors are responsive to antiestrogen treatment and have a better prognosis than estrogen receptor-negative tumors. The loss of estrogen and progesterone receptors appears to be associated with a progression to less-differentiated tumors. We transfected the human estrogen receptor into the estrogen receptor-negative metastatic breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 in an attempt to restore their sensitivity to antiestrogens. Two stable sublines of MDA-MB-231 cells (HC1 and HE5) expressing functional estrogen receptors were studied for their ability to grow and invade in vitro and to metastasize in athymic nude mice. The number and size of lung metastases developed by these two sublines in ovariectomized nude mice was not markedly altered by tamoxifen but was inhibited 3-fold by estradiol. Estradiol also significantly inhibited in vitro cell proliferation of these sublines and their invasiveness in Matrigel, a reconstituted basement membrane, whereas the antiestrogens 4-hydroxytamoxifen and ICI 164,384 reversed these effects. These results show that estradiol inhibits the metastatic ability of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer cells following transfection with the estrogen receptor, whereas estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers are stimulated by estrogen, indicating that factors other than the estrogen receptor are involved in progression toward hormone independence. Reactivation or transfer of the estrogen receptor gene can therefore be considered as therapeutic approaches to hormone-independent cancers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Methylation of the oestrogen receptor CpG island links ageing and neoplasia in human colon
Issa, J.-P. J., Ottaviano, Y. L., Celano, P., Hamilton, S. R., Davidson, N. E., & Baylin, S. B. (1994) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0894-536 · Cited by 1,191
Relevance of Breast Cancer Cell Lines as Models for Breast Tumours: An Update
Lacroix, M., & Leclercq, G. (2004) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1023/b:brea.0000014042.54925.cc · Cited by 782
Clinical Significance of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Faderl, S., Kantarjian, H. M., Talpaz, M., & Estrov, Z. (1998) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v91.11.3995 · Cited by 335
Pathways to tamoxifen resistance
Riggins, R. B., Schrecengost, R. S., Guerrero, M. S., & Bouton, A. H. (2007) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2007.03.016 · Cited by 277
Estrogen receptor beta in breast cancer.
Palmieri, C., Cheng, G. J., Saji, S., Zelada-Hedman, M., W√§rri, A., Weihua, Z., Van Noorden, S., Wahlstrom, T., Coombes, R. C., Warner, M., et al. (2002) · Endocrine-related cancer · doi:10.1677/erc.0.0090001 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Garcia, M., Derocq, D., Freiss, G., & Rochefort, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 11538-11542
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1966568300
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activation of estrogen receptor transfected into a receptor-negative breast cancer cell line decreases the metastatic and invasive potential of the cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.89.23.11538
- The paper
- Garcia, M., Derocq, D., Freiss, G., & Rochefort, H. (1992). Activation of estrogen receptor transfected into a receptor-negative breast cancer cell line decreases the metastatic and invasive potential of the cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.23.11538
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.