Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A positive selection vector for cloning high molecular weight DNA by the bacteriophage P1 system: improved cloning efficacy.

Open access
Pierce, J C, Sauer, B, Sternberg, N·1992·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The bacteriophage P1 cloning system can package and propagate DNA inserts that are up to 95 kilobases. Clones are maintained in Escherichia coli by a low-copy replicon in the P1 cloning vector and can be amplified by inducing a second replicon in the vector with isopropyl beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside. To overcome the necessity of screening clones for DNA inserts, we have developed a P1 vector with a positive selection system that is based on the properties of the sacB gene from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Expression of that gene kills E. coli cells that are grown in the presence of sucrose. In the new P1 vector (pAd10sacBII) sacB expression is regulated by a synthetic E. coli promoter that also contains a P1 C1 repressor binding site. A unique BamHI cloning site is located between the promoter and the sacB structural gene. Cloning DNA fragments into the BamHI site interrupts sacB expression and permits growth of plasmid-containing cells in the presence of sucrose. We have also bordered the BamHI site with unique rare-cutting restriction sites Not I, Sal I, and Sfi I and with T7 and Sp6 promoter sequences to facilitate characterization and analysis of P1 clones. We describe here the use of Not I digestion to size the cloned DNA fragments and RNA probes to identify the ends of those fragments. The positive selection P1 vector provides a 65- to 75-fold discrimination of P1 clones that contain inserts from those that do not. It therefore permits generation of genomic libraries that are much easier to use for gene isolation and genome mapping than are our previous libraries. Also, the new vector makes it feasible to generate P1 libraries from small amounts of genomic insert DNA, such as from sorted chromosomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.89.6.2056

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Pierce, J. C., Sauer, B., & Sternberg, N.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1992-03-15
Volume
89
Issue
6
Pages
2056-2060
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2000678289
Cited by
158
References
2
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A positive selection vector for cloning high molecular weight DNA by the bacteriophage P1 system: improved cloning efficacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.89.6.2056
The paper
Pierce, J. C., Sauer, B., & Sternberg, N. (1992). A positive selection vector for cloning high molecular weight DNA by the bacteriophage P1 system: improved cloning efficacy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.6.2056

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.