The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reversal of muscle differentiation during urodele limb regeneration.
Open accessAbstract
Recent studies suggest that maintenance of the differentiated state requires continuous regulation. Limb regeneration in urodele amphibians provides a context in which to address this issue, as limb regeneration may involve the dedifferentiation of multinucleate myotubes to yield mononucleate blastemal cells, which then proliferate and contribute to regenerate tissues. To evaluate this possibility, cultured newt limb myotubes were selectively microinjected with the lineage tracer rhodamine-dextran and introduced into regenerating limbs. In culture, such labeled myotubes were stable after 6-8 weeks, and transfer of the tracer to mononucleate cells was not observed. In contrast, after implantation of labeled myotubes under the wound epidermis of limb blastemas, strongly labeled mononucleate cells were observed after 1 week. These cells could be double-labeled with the cytoplasmic lineage tracer and [3H]thymidine that had been incorporated into the nuclei of implanted myotubes. The number of labeled mononucleate cells increased significantly by 2-3 weeks after implantation, indicating that these cells proliferated. Although the fate of these cells at later times was uncertain, we provide evidence consistent with their subsequent differentiation. These results demonstrate reversal in the mononucleate-to-multinucleate transition of vertebrate myogenesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cellular and Molecular Regulation of Muscle Regeneration
CHARGÉ, S. B. P., & RUDNICKI, M. A. (2004) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00019.2003 · Cited by 2,680
Cells keep a memory of their tissue origin during axolotl limb regeneration
Kragl, M., Knapp, D., Nacu, E., Khattak, S., Maden, M., Epperlein, H. H., & Tanaka, E. M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08152 · Cited by 850
Lepilina, A., Coon, A. N., Kikuchi, K., Holdway, J. E., Roberts, R. W., Burns, C. G., & Poss, K. D. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.052 · Cited by 833
Distinct Wnt signaling pathways have opposing roles in appendage regeneration
Stoick-Cooper, C. L., Weidinger, G., Riehle, K. J., Hubbert, C., Major, M. B., Fausto, N., & Moon, R. T. (2007) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.001123 · Cited by 532
C/EBP is an immediate-early gene required for the consolidation of long-term facilitation in Aplysia
Alberini, C. M., Ghirardl, M., Metz, R., & Kandel, E. R. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90386-7 · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Lo, D. C., Allen, F., & Brockes, J. P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 7230-7234
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1988257487
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reversal of muscle differentiation during urodele limb regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.90.15.7230
- The paper
- Lo, D. C., Allen, F., & Brockes, J. P. (1993). Reversal of muscle differentiation during urodele limb regeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.15.7230
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.