The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved prediction of protein secondary structure by use of sequence profiles and neural networks.
Open accessAbstract
The explosive accumulation of protein sequences in the wake of large-scale sequencing projects is in stark contrast to the much slower experimental determination of protein structures. Improved methods of structure prediction from the gene sequence alone are therefore needed. Here, we report a substantial increase in both the accuracy and quality of secondary-structure predictions, using a neural-network algorithm. The main improvements come from the use of multiple sequence alignments (better overall accuracy), from "balanced training" (better prediction of beta-strands), and from "structure context training" (better prediction of helix and strand lengths). This method, cross-validated on seven different test sets purged of sequence similarity to learning sets, achieves a three-state prediction accuracy of 69.7%, significantly better than previous methods. In addition, the predicted structures have a more realistic distribution of helix and strand segments. The predictions may be suitable for use in practice as a first estimate of the structural type of newly sequenced proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Self-citationComparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399
The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins.
Chothia, C., & Lesk, A. M. (1986) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04288.x · Cited by 2,458
Cited by
ProtTrans: Toward Understanding the Language of Life Through Self-Supervised Learning
Elnaggar, A., Heinzinger, M., Dallago, C., Rehawi, G., Wang, Y., Jones, L., Gibbs, T., Feher, T., Angerer, C., Steinegger, M., et al. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3095381 · Cited by 2,329
A signature motif in transcriptional co-activators mediates binding to nuclear receptors
Heery, D. M., Kalkhoven, E., Hoare, S., & Parker, M. G. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/42750 · Cited by 2,128
Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure
Rost, B., & Sander, C. (1994) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340190108 · Cited by 1,452
Self-citationModeling the language of life – Deep Learning Protein Sequences
Heinzinger, M., Elnaggar, A., Wang, Y., Dallago, C., Nechaev, D., Matthes, F., & Rost, B. (2019) · doi:10.1101/614313 · Cited by 606
Self-citationModeling aspects of the language of life through transfer-learning protein sequences
Heinzinger, M., Elnaggar, A., Wang, Y., Dallago, C., Nechaev, D., Matthes, F., & Rost, B. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-3220-8 · Cited by 606
“The second layer (struc-ture-to-structure [2, 3]) created the final predictions by applying again a CNN (w = 7) over the output of the first layer.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rost, B., & Sander, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1993-08-15
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 7558-7562
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1996073320
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved prediction of protein secondary structure by use of sequence profiles and neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.90.16.7558
- The paper
- Rost, B., & Sander, C. (1993). Improved prediction of protein secondary structure by use of sequence profiles and neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.16.7558
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.