The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Borrelia burgdorferi is clonal: implications for taxonomy and vaccine development.
Open accessAbstract
The chromosomal genes fla and p93 and the ospA gene from a linear plasmid were sequenced from up to 15 isolates of Borrelia burgdorferi, which causes Lyme borreliosis in man. Comparison of the gene trees provides no evidence for genetic exchange between chromosomal genes, suggesting B. burgdorferi is strictly clonal. Comparison of the chromosomal gene trees with that of the plasmid-encoded ospA reveals that plasmid transfer between clones is rare. Evidence for intragenic recombination was found in only a single ospA allele. The analysis reveals three common clones and a number of rare clones that are so highly divergent that vaccines developed against one are unlikely to provide immunity to organisms from others. Consequently, an understanding of the geographic and genetic variability of B. burgdorferi will prove essential for the development of effective vaccines and programs for control. While the major clones might be regarded as different species, the clonal population structure, the geographic localization, and the widespread incidence of Lyme disease suggest that B. burgdorferi should remain the name for the entire array of organisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multilocus Sequence Typing of Bacteria
Maiden, M. C. J. (2006) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121325 · Cited by 915
Total bacterial diversity in soil and sediment communities—A review
Torsvik, V, Sørheim, R., & Goksøyr, J. (1996) · Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/bf01574690 · Cited by 517
POSTIC, D., ASSOUS, M. V., GRIMONT, P. A. D., & BARANTON, G. (1994) · International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology · doi:10.1099/00207713-44-4-743 · Cited by 499
Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria
Sharp, P. M. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki242 · Cited by 429
Bunikis, J., Garpmo, U., Tsao, J., Berglund, J., Fish, D., & Barbour, A. G. (2004) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.26944-0 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Dykhuizen, D. E., Polin, D. S., Dunn, J. J., Wilske, B., Preac-Mursic, V, Dattwyler, R. J., & Luft, B. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 10163-10167
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2056476156
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Borrelia burgdorferi is clonal: implications for taxonomy and vaccine development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.90.21.10163
- The paper
- Dykhuizen, D. E., Polin, D. S., Dunn, J. J., Wilske, B., Preac-Mursic, V, Dattwyler, R. J., & Luft, B. J. (1993). Borrelia burgdorferi is clonal: implications for taxonomy and vaccine development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.21.10163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.