The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Animals and fungi are each other's closest relatives: congruent evidence from multiple proteins.
Open accessAbstract
Phylogenetic relationships among plants, animals, and fungi were examined by using sequences from 25 proteins. Four insertions/deletions were found that are shared by two of the three taxonomic groups in question, and all four are uniquely shared by animals and fungi relative to plants, protists, and bacteria. These include a 12-amino acid insertion in translation elongation factor 1 alpha and three small gaps in enolase. Maximum-parsimony trees were constructed from published data for four of the most broadly sequenced of the 25 proteins, actin, alpha-tubulin, beta-tubulin, and elongation factor 1 alpha, with the latter supplemented by three new outgroup sequences. All four proteins place animals and fungi together as a monophyletic group to the exclusion of plants and a broad diversity of protists. In all cases, bootstrap analyses show no support for either an animal-plant or fungal-plant clade. This congruence among multiple lines of evidence strongly suggests, in contrast to traditional and current classification, that animals and fungi are sister groups while plants constitute an independent evolutionary lineage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Endosymbiont Hypothesis Revisited
Gray, M. W. (1992) · International Review of Cytology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62068-9 · Cited by 586
Cited by
Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies.
Rokas, A., Williams, B. L., King, N., & Carroll, S. B. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02053 · Cited by 1,512
Determining Divergence Times of the Major Kingdoms of Living Organisms with a Protein Clock
Doolittle, R. F., Feng, D.-F., Tsang, S., Cho, G., & Little, E. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5248.470 · Cited by 581
Keeling, P. J., Burger, G., Durnford, D. G., Lang, B. F., Lee, R. W., Pearlman, R. E., Roger, A. J., & Gray, M. W. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.09.005 · Cited by 579
Hsp90 Governs Echinocandin Resistance in the Pathogenic Yeast Candida albicans via Calcineurin
Singh, S. D., Robbins, N., Zaas, A. K., Schell, W. A., Perfect, J. R., & Cowen, L. E. (2009) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000532 · Cited by 362
“Fungi are eukaryotes and share close evolutionary relationships with their human hosts [6,7].”
BackgroundPHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS IN MOLECULAR EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS
Nei, M. (1996) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.30.1.371 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Baldauf, S. L., & Palmer, J. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1993-12-15
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 11558-11562
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2159718078
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Animals and fungi are each other's closest relatives: congruent evidence from multiple proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.90.24.11558
- The paper
- Baldauf, S. L., & Palmer, J. D. (1993). Animals and fungi are each other's closest relatives: congruent evidence from multiple proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.24.11558
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.