Cited by 581Protist diversity and phylogenyGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Determining Divergence Times of the Major Kingdoms of Living Organisms with a Protein Clock

Doolittle, Russell F., Feng, Da-Fei, Tsang, Simon, Cho, Glen, Little, Elizabeth·1996·Science

Abstract

Amino acid sequence data from 57 different enzymes were used to determine the divergence times of the major biological groupings. Deuterostomes and protostomes split about 670 million years ago and plants, animals, and fungi last shared a common ancestor about a billion years ago. With regard to these protein sequences, plants are slightly more similar to animals than are the fungi. In contrast, phylogenetic analysis of the same sequences indicates that fungi and animals shared a common ancestor more recently than either did with plants, the greater difference resulting from the fungal lineage changing faster than the animal and plant lines over the last 965 million years. The major protist lineages have been changing at a somewhat faster rate than other eukaryotes and split off about 1230 million years ago. If the rate of change has been approximately constant, then prokaryotes and eukaryotes last shared a common ancestor about 2 billion years ago, archaebacterial sequences being measurably more similar to eukaryotic ones than are eubacterial ones.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.271.5248.470

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some molecular date estimates contradict other lines of evidence, such as a molecular date for the split between kingdoms that is markedly younger than the earliest fossils.

    “Some seem to contradict other lines of evidence, such as the study that produced a molecular date estimate for the split between kingdoms that is markedly younger than the earliest fossils 47 .”

    From The modern molecular clock (2003) · cites this paper as [47]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doolittle, R. F., Feng, D.-F., Tsang, S., Cho, G., & Little, E.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Doolittle, Russell F.
Venue
Science
Published
1996-01-26
Volume
271
Issue
5248
Pages
470-477
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1970473208
Cited by
581
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
22.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 26873)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
divergence time, molecular clock, amino acid substitution rates, protein sequences, enzyme sequence, eukaryotic origin, archaea, eukaryotic phylogeny
MeSH terms
Cyanobacteria, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Archaea, Bacteria, Enzymes, Eukaryotic Cells, Fossils, Fungi, Humans, Phylogeny, Plants, Prokaryotic Cells, Sequence Alignment, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review