The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gamma delta T cells contribute to immunity against the liver stages of malaria in alpha beta T-cell-deficient mice.
Open accessAbstract
The functional role of gamma delta T cells (expressing the gamma delta heterodimeric T-cell receptor for antigen) in infectious diseases remains largely unknown. We have therefore attempted to define the possible role of these T cells in the immune response against the various developmental stages of malaria parasites. For this purpose, we monitored the immune response and the development of liver and blood stages of Plasmodium yoelii, a rodent malaria parasite, in immunized and nonimmunized alpha beta T-cell-deficient and gamma delta T-cell-deficient mice. Immunization of alpha beta T-cell-deficient mice with irradiated sporozoites induced an immune response that significantly inhibited the development of the parasite's liver stages. This inhibitory immune response was abolished by an antibody-mediated transient in vivo depletion of gamma delta T cells. Two gamma delta T-cell clones were derived from malaria-immunized alpha beta T-cell-deficient mice. The adoptive transfer of one of these gamma delta T-cell clones to normal mice inhibited the development of liver stages, following sporozoite inoculation. These results provide evidence for gamma delta T-cell-mediated protective immunity against parasites, in the absence of alpha beta T cells. As for the blood phase of the infection, both normal mice and gamma delta T-cell-deficient mice cleared the blood stages of the nonlethal strain of P. yoelii, while alpha beta T-cell-deficient mice failed to control the parasitemia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Six-of-the-best: unique contributions of γδ T cells to immunology
Vantourout, P., & Hayday, A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3384 · Cited by 1,232
γδ T cells in tissue physiology and surveillance
Ribot, J. C., Lopes, N., & Silva-Santos, B. (2021) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-020-00452-4 · Cited by 532
Development and Selection of T Cells: Facts and Puzzles
Kisielow, P., & Von Boehmer, H. (1995) · Advances in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60620-3 · Cited by 444
Protection against malaria at 1 year and immune correlates following PfSPZ vaccination
Ishizuka, A. S., Lyke, K. E., DeZure, A., Berry, A. A., Richie, T. L., Mendoza, F. H., Enama, M. E., Gordon, I. J., Chang, L.-J., Sarwar, U. N., et al. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4110 · Cited by 367
Yoshida, L. S., Nishida, S., Shimoyama, T., Kawahara, T., Kondo-Teshima, S., Rokutan, K., Kobayashi, T., & Tsunawaki, S. (2004) · Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin · doi:10.1248/bpb.27.147 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsuji, M., Mombaerts, P., Lefrancois, L., Nussenzweig, R. S., Zavala, F., & Tonegawa, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1994-01-04
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 345-349
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2146175972
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gamma delta T cells contribute to immunity against the liver stages of malaria in alpha beta T-cell-deficient mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.91.1.345
- The paper
- Tsuji, M., Mombaerts, P., Lefrancois, L., Nussenzweig, R. S., Zavala, F., & Tonegawa, S. (1994). Gamma delta T cells contribute to immunity against the liver stages of malaria in alpha beta T-cell-deficient mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.1.345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.