Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Growth arrest by induction of p53 in DNA damaged keratinocytes is bypassed by human papillomavirus 16 E7

Demers, G W, Foster, S A, Halbert, C L, Galloway, D A·1994·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Cellular tumor suppressors p53 and Rb play an important role in controlling cell proliferation. Inactivation of these tumor suppressor proteins can occur by gene mutation or by association with oncoproteins from the small DNA tumor viruses. One function of p53 is in regulating cell cycle check-point control after DNA damage. To dissect the pathways by which p53 and Rb may act, the E6 and E7 oncogenes of human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6 and 16 were introduced into primary human epithelial cells by retroviral transfer vector, and cells were assayed for growth arrest after DNA damage induced by actinomycin D. The E6 or E7 oncogenes from the low-risk HPV6 had no affect on growth arrest, p53 protein levels increased, Rb protein levels decreased, and Rb was predominantly in the hypophosphorylated state similar to vector-infected cells. Either the E6 or the E7 oncogene from the high-risk HPV16 abrogated growth arrest. Cells expressing HPV16 E6 (16E6) were severely reduced in p53 protein levels that did not increase detectably after DNA damage, Rb protein levels did not decrease, and hyperphosphorylated Rb was present. After DNA damage in cells expressing 16E7 p53 levels increased, and Rb protein levels decreased; however, Rb was predominantly in the hyperphosphorylated state. Even though p53 protein levels increased in response to DNA damage in cells expressing 16E7, G1 growth arrest was bypassed. This suggests that the circuitry controlling the growth arrest signal after DNA damage may be interconnected between the p53 and Rb pathways.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4382

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [11]Kuerbitz, S. J., Plunkett, B. S., Walsh, W. V. & Kastan, M. B. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 7491–7495.
  2. [27]Kessis, T. D., Slebos, R. J., Nelson, W. G., Kastan, M. B., Plunkett, B. S., Han, S. M., Lorincz, A. T., Hedrick, L. & Cho, K. R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 3988–3992.
  3. [31]Trask, D. K. & Muller, M. T. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 1417–1421.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Demers, G. W., Foster, S. A., Halbert, C. L., & Galloway, D. A.
Affiliations
Cancer Biology Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98104.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1994-05-10
Volume
91
Issue
10
Pages
4382-4386
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
172
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review