The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An in vitro polysome display system for identifying ligands from very large peptide libraries.
Open accessAbstract
We have used an in vitro protein synthesis system to construct a very large library of peptides displayed on polysomes. A pool of DNA sequences encoding 10(12) random decapeptides was incubated in an Escherichia coli S30 coupled transcription/translation system. Polysomes were isolated and screened by affinity selection of the nascent peptides on an immobilized monoclonal antibody specific for the peptide dynorphin B. The mRNA from the enriched pool of polysomes was recovered, copied into cDNA, and amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to produce template for the next round of in vitro synthesis and selection. A portion of the amplified template from each round was cloned into a filamentous phagemid vector to determine the specificity of peptide binding by phage ELISA and to sequence the DNA. After four rounds of affinity selection, the majority of clones encoded peptides that bound specifically to the antibody and contained a consensus sequence that is similar to the known epitope for the antibody. Synthetic peptides corresponding to several of these sequences have binding affinities ranging from 7 to 140 nM. The in vitro system described here has the potential to screen peptide libraries that are three to six orders of magnitude larger than current biological peptide display systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Isolation of New Ribozymes from a Large Pool of Random Sequences
Bartel, D. P., & Szostak, J. W. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7690155 · Cited by 900
Cited by
Proteomics to study genes and genomes
Pandey, A., & Mann, M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35015709 · Cited by 2,373
In Vitro Selection of Functional Nucleic Acids
Wilson, D. S., & Szostak, J. W. (1999) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.611 · Cited by 1,206
Man-made cell-like compartments for molecular evolution
Tawfik, D. S., & Griffiths, A. D. (1998) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0798-652 · Cited by 956
Engineering novel binding proteins from nonimmunoglobulin domains
Binz, H. K., Amstutz, P., & Plückthun, A. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1127 · Cited by 676
Antibody phage display technology and its applications
Hoogenboom, H. R., de Bruı̈ne, A. P., Hufton, S. E., Hoet, R. M., Arends, J.-W., & Roovers, R. C. (1998) · Immunotechnology · doi:10.1016/s1380-2933(98)00007-4 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Mattheakis, L. C., Bhatt, R. R., & Dower, W. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1994-09-13
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 9022-9026
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2030189518
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An in vitro polysome display system for identifying ligands from very large peptide libraries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.91.19.9022
- The paper
- Mattheakis, L. C., Bhatt, R. R., & Dower, W. J. (1994). An in vitro polysome display system for identifying ligands from very large peptide libraries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.19.9022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.