The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution.
Open accessAbstract
Computer simulations of the evolution of linear sequences have demonstrated the importance of recombination of blocks of sequence rather than point mutagenesis alone. Repeated cycles of point mutagenesis, recombination, and selection should allow in vitro molecular evolution of complex sequences, such as proteins. A method for the reassembly of genes from their random DNA fragments, resulting in in vitro recombination is reported. A 1-kb gene, after DNase I digestion and purification of 10- to 50-bp random fragments, was reassembled to its original size and function. Similarly, a 2.7-kb plasmid could be efficiently reassembled. Complete recombination was obtained between two markers separated by 75 bp; each marker was located on a separate gene. Oligonucleotides with 3' and 5' ends that are homologous to the gene can be added to the fragment mixture and incorporated into the reassembled gene. Thus, mixtures of synthetic oligonucleotides and PCR fragments can be mixed into a gene at defined positions based on homology. As an example, a library of chimeras of the human and murine genes for interleukin 1 beta has been prepared. Shuffling can also be used for the in vitro equivalent of some standard genetic manipulations, such as a backcross with parental DNA. The advantages of recombination over existing mutagenesis methods are likely to increase with the numbers of cycles of molecular evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Isolation of New Ribozymes from a Large Pool of Random Sequences
Bartel, D. P., & Szostak, J. W. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7690155 · Cited by 900
Cited by
Grimm, D., Lee, J. S., Wang, L., Desai, T., Akache, B., Storm, T. A., & Kay, M. A. (2008) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00254-08 · Cited by 696
Kurek, I., Chang, T. K., Bertain, S. M., Madrigal, A., Liu, L., Lassner, M. W., & Zhu, G. (2007) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.107.054171 · Cited by 343
Insights into Cytokine–Receptor Interactions from Cytokine Engineering
Spangler, J. B., Moraga, I., Mendoza, J. L., & Garcia, K. C. (2015) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120211 · Cited by 304
Enhancing the Clinical Potential of AAV Vectors by Capsid Engineering to Evade Pre-Existing Immunity
Bartel, M. (2011) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2011.00204 · Cited by 108
Highlights in Biocatalysis – Historical Landmarks and Current Trends
Bornscheuer, U. T., & Buchholz, K. (2005) · Engineering in Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/elsc.200520089 · Cited by 80
Curtis, E. A., & Bartel, D. P. (2013) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.037572.112 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Stemmer, W. P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1994-10-25
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 10747-10751
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2071086763
- Cited by
- 1,284
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.