The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Panglobal distribution of a single clonal lineage of the Irish potato famine fungus.
Open accessAbstract
More than 300 isolates of the Irish potato famine fungus, Phytophthora infestans, collected in 20 countries on five continents, were analyzed for genetic variation at the mating type and two allozyme loci. A subset of more than 200 isolates was also analyzed for DNA "fingerprint" variation. A surprising result was that a single clonal lineage dominated most populations worldwide. All of the variation within this lineage appeared to have arisen by mitotic recombination or by mutation. In addition to the most common clonal lineage, a number of different, but apparently closely related, lineages occurred in the United States and Canada. The low levels of gene diversity in the derived populations compared to the presumed ancestral population in central Mexico indicate that P. infestans went through extreme genetic bottlenecks during its dispersal. The genetic data are consistent with the hypothesis that the initial migration of P. infestans in the 1840s was from Mexico to the United States and that only a single genetic individual was transported to Europe and subsequently to the rest of the world. If this hypothesis is correct, then the Irish potato famine was caused by a single clonal genotype of P. infestans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities
NEI, M., & CHESSER, R. K. (1983) · Annals of Human Genetics · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1983.tb00993.x · Cited by 942
Maruyama, T., & Fuerst, P. A. (1985) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/111.3.675 · Cited by 596
Goodwin, S. B., Drenth, A., & Fry, W. E. (1992) · Current Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00351469 · Cited by 290
Self-citation
Cited by
The Top 10 oomycete pathogens in molecular plant pathology
Kamoun, S., Furzer, O., Jones, J. D. G., Judelson, H. S., Ali, G. S., Dalio, R. J. D., Roy, S. G., Schena, L., Zambounis, A., Panabières, F., et al. (2015) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/mpp.12190 · Cited by 991
Self-citationPhytophthora infestans : the plant (and R gene) destroyer
FRY, W. (2008) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00465.x · Cited by 802
Self-citationThreats to global food security from emerging fungal and oomycete crop pathogens
Fones, H. N., Bebber, D. P., Chaloner, T. M., Kay, W. T., Steinberg, G., & Gurr, S. J. (2020) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-020-0075-0 · Cited by 640
The Origins of Plant Pathogens in Agro-Ecosystems
Stukenbrock, E. H., & McDonald, B. A. (2008) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.010708.154114 · Cited by 624
RECOMBINATION AND THE MULTILOCUS STRUCTURE OF FUNGAL POPULATIONS
Milgroom, M. G. (1996) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.34.1.457 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodwin, S. B., Cohen, B. A., & Fry, W. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1994-11-22
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 11591-11595
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2055177323
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Panglobal distribution of a single clonal lineage of the Irish potato famine fungus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.91.24.11591
- The paper
- Goodwin, S. B., Cohen, B. A., & Fry, W. E. (1994). Panglobal distribution of a single clonal lineage of the Irish potato famine fungus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.24.11591
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.