The DOI matches its Crossref record.
POPULATION BOTTLENECKS AND NONEQUILIBRIUM MODELS IN POPULATION GENETICS. II. NUMBER OF ALLELES IN A SMALL POPULATION THAT WAS FORMED BY A RECENT BOTTLENECK
Abstract
A model is presented in which a large population in mutation/drift equilibrium undergoes a severe restriction in size and subsequently remains at the small size. The rate of loss of genetic variability has been studied. Allelic loss occurs more rapidly than loss of genic heterozygosity. Rare alleles are lost especially rapidly. The result is a transient deficiency in the total number of alleles observed in samples taken from the reduced population when compared with the number expected in a sample from a steady-state population having the same observed heterozygosity. Alternatively, the population can be considered to posses excess gene diversity if the number of alleles is used as the statistical estimator of mutation rate. The deficit in allele number arises principally from a lack of those alleles that are expected to appear only once or twice in the sample. The magnitude of the allelic deficiency is less, however, than the excess that an earlier study predicted to follow a rapid population expansion. This suggests that populations that have undergone a single bottleneck event, followed by rapid population growth, should have an apparent excess number of alleles, given the observed level of genic heterozygosity and provided that the bottleneck has not occurred very recently. Conversely, such populations will be deficient for observed heterozygosity if allele number is used as the sufficient statistic for the estimation of 4Nev. Populations that have undergone very recent restrictions in size should show the opposite tendencies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Luikart, G., & Cornuet, J.-M. (1998) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96388.x · Cited by 1,206
Panglobal distribution of a single clonal lineage of the Irish potato famine fungus.
Goodwin, S. B., Cohen, B. A., & Fry, W. E. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.24.11591 · Cited by 465
Meta‐analysis reveals lower genetic diversity in overfished populations
Pinsky, M. L., & Palumbi, S. R. (2014) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12509 · Cited by 458
The Effects of Genetic and Geographic Structure on Neutral Variation
Charlesworth, B., Charlesworth, D., & Barton, N. H. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132359 · Cited by 293
The Effects of a Bottleneck on Inbreeding Depression and the Genetic Load
Kirkpatrick, M., & Jarne, P. (2000) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303312 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Maruyama, T., & Fuerst, P. A.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-11-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 675-689
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2132838928
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: POPULATION BOTTLENECKS AND NONEQUILIBRIUM MODELS IN POPULATION GENETICS. II. NUMBER OF ALLELES IN A SMALL POPULATION THAT WAS FORMED BY A RECENT BOTTLENECK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/111.3.675
- The paper
- Maruyama, T., & Fuerst, P. A. (1985). POPULATION BOTTLENECKS AND NONEQUILIBRIUM MODELS IN POPULATION GENETICS. II. NUMBER OF ALLELES IN A SMALL POPULATION THAT WAS FORMED BY A RECENT BOTTLENECK. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/111.3.675
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.