The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and proteinsequences: paralinear distances.
Open accessAbstract
The reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from DNA and protein sequences is confounded by unequal rate effects. These effects can group rapidly evolving taxa with other rapidly evolving taxa, whether or not they are genealogically related. All algorithms are sensitive to these effects whenever the assumptions on which they are based are not met. The algorithm presented here, called paralinear distances, is valid for a much broader class of substitution processes than previous algorithms and is accordingly less affected by unequal rate effects. It may be used with all nucleic acid, protein, or other sequences, provided that their evolution may be modeled as a succession of Markov processes. The properties of the method have been proven both analytically and by computer simulations. Like all other methods, paralinear distances can fail when sequences are misaligned or when site-to-site sequence variation of rates is extensive. To examine the usefulness of paralinear distances, the "origin of the eukaryotes" has been investigated by the analysis of elongation factor Tu sequences with a variety of sequence alignments. It has been found that the order in which sequences are pairwise aligned strongly determines the topology which is reconstructed by paralinear distances (as it does for all other reconstruction methods tested). When the parts of the alignment that are unaffected by alignment order are analyzed, paralinear distances strongly select the eocyte topology. This provides evidence that the eocyte prokaryotes are the closest prokaryotic relatives of the eukaryotes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A rate-independent technique for analysis of nucleic acid sequences: evolutionary parsimony.
(1987) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040433 · Cited by 377
Self-citation
Cited by
DAMBE: Software Package for Data Analysis in Molecular Biology and Evolution
Xia, X. (2001) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/92.4.371 · Cited by 2,365
Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals
Aguinaldo, A. M. A., Turbeville, J. M., Linford, L. S., Rivera, M. C., Garey, J. R., Raff, R. A., & Lake, J. A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387489a0 · Cited by 1,609
Self-citationAn index of substitution saturation and its application
Xia, X., Xie, Z., Salemi, M., Chen, L., & Wang, Y. (2003) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00326-3 · Cited by 1,542
An archaeal origin of eukaryotes supports only two primary domains of life
Williams, T. A., Foster, P. G., Cox, C. J., & Embley, T. M. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12779 · Cited by 519
Modeling compositional heterogeneity
Foster, P. G. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490445779 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Lake, J. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1994-02-15
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1455-1459
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2090995971
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and proteinsequences: paralinear distances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.91.4.1455
- The paper
- Lake, J. A. (1994). Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and proteinsequences: paralinear distances. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.4.1455
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.