A rate-independent technique for analysis of nucleic acid sequences: evolutionary parsimony.
Open accessAbstract
The method of evolutionary parsimony--or operator invariants--is a technique of nucleic acid sequence analysis related to parsimony analysis and explicitly designed for determining evolutionary relationships among four distantly related taxa. The method is independent of substitution rates because it is derived from consideration of the group properties of substitution operators rather than from an analysis of the probabilities of substitution in branches of a tree. In both parsimony and evolutionary parsimony, three patterns of nucleotide substitution are associated one-to-one with the three topologically linked trees for four taxa. In evolutionary parsimony, the three quantities are operator invariants. These invariants are the remnants of substitutions that have occurred in the interior branch of the tree and are analogous to the substitutions assigned to the central branch by parsimony. The two invariants associated with the incorrect trees must equal zero (statistically), whereas only the correct tree can have a nonzero invariant. The chi 2-test is used to ascertain the nonzero invariant and the statistically favored tree. Examples, obtained using data calculated with evolutionary rates and branchings designed to camouflage the true tree, show that the method accurately predicts the tree, even when substitution rates differ greatly in neighboring peripheral branches (conditions under which parsimony will consistently fail). As the number of substitutions in peripheral branches becomes fewer, the parsimony and the evolutionary-parsimony solutions converge. The method is robust and easy to use.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transversion parsimony analysis of these positions produced 84 equally parsimonious trees resulting in the strict-consensus tree of figure 3A.
“Transversion parsimony analysis (Lake 1987) of these positions produced 84 equally parsimonious trees resulting in the strict-consensus tree of figure 3A.”
From Phylogeny of the Bovidae (Artiodactyla, Mammalia), based on mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. (1992) · cites this paper as Lake 1987
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of long-branch attraction
Bergsten, J. (2005) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00059.x · Cited by 1,162 · see citing works
Evolution of the vacuolar H+-ATPase: implications for the origin of eukaryotes.
Gogarten, J. P., Kibak, H., Dittrich, P., Taiz, L., Bowman, E. J., Bowman, B. J., Manolson, M. F., Poole, R. J., Date, T., Oshima, T., et al. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.17.6661 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution
Goldman, N. (1993) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00166252 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
The Endosymbiont Hypothesis Revisited
Gray, M. W. (1992) · International Review of Cytology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62068-9 · Cited by 586 · see citing works
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., & Yano, T.-A. (1989) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/0047-2484(89)90075-4 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Phylogeny of the Bovidae (Artiodactyla, Mammalia), based on mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences.
(1992) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040734 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lake, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- James A. Lake
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 167-91
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2165801219
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-24034)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
- Keywords
- nucleic acid sequence analysis, phylogenetic inference, substitution rate, parsimony analysis, chi-square test, substitution operator
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Biometry, Biological Evolution, Methods, Models, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review