The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temperature acclimation and competitive fitness: anexperimental test of the beneficial acclimation assumption.
Open accessAbstract
Phenotypic acclimation is generally assumed to confer an advantage in the environment that stimulates the response. To test this beneficial acclimation assumption explicitly, we investigated the consequences of temperature acclimation for the fitness of Escherichia coli at two temperatures, 32 degrees C and 41.5 degrees C. Both temperatures permit growth and long-term persistence of the genotypes in serial culture. We found that prior acclimation to 32 degrees C, relative to acclimation to 41.5 degrees C, enhanced fitness at 32 degrees C, consistent with the assumption. But prior acclimation to 41.5 degrees C actually reduced fitness at 41.5 degrees C, relative to acclimation to 32 degrees C. Hence, the assumption that acclimation always confers an advantage is demonstrated to be false. Acclimation to 41.5 degrees C did, however, improve survival at 50 degrees C, a lethal temperature. This protective response has been shown to be associated with the induction of stress proteins. The reduced competitive fitness caused by acclimation at 41.5 degrees C may reflect a physiological burden associated with expression of stress proteins when they are not needed to prevent lethal damage. Whatever the cause, acclimation to the higher temperature decreased competitive fitness at that temperature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 · Cited by 7,770
Temperature Biology of Animals
Cossins, A. R., & Bowler, K. (1987) · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3127-5 · Cited by 1,184
Rapid evolution in response to high-temperature selection
Bennett, A. F., Dao, K. M., & Lenski, R. E. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/346079a0 · Cited by 182
Self-citation
Cited by
Physiological Diversity in Insects: Ecological and Evolutionary Contexts
Chown, S. L., & Terblanche, J. S. (2006) · Advances in Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2806(06)33002-0 · Cited by 573
Ecological processes in a hormetic framework
Costantini, D., Metcalfe, N. B., & Monaghan, P. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01531.x · Cited by 306
Microbial experimental evolution
Bennett, A. F., & Hughes, B. S. (2009) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.90562.2008 · Cited by 58
Self-citationRevisiting the Design of the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
Lenski, R. E. (2023) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s00239-023-10095-3 · Cited by 62
Self-citationScharf, I., Galkin, N., & Halle, S. (2015) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/s11692-014-9298-z · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Leroi, A. M., Bennett, A. F., & Lenski, R. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1917-1921
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2088717394
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temperature acclimation and competitive fitness: anexperimental test of the beneficial acclimation assumption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.91.5.1917
- The paper
- Leroi, A. M., Bennett, A. F., & Lenski, R. E. (1994). Temperature acclimation and competitive fitness: anexperimental test of the beneficial acclimation assumption. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.5.1917
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.