The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bidirectional interlocus concerted evolution following allopolyploid speciation in cotton (Gossypium).
Open accessAbstract
Polyploidy is a prominent process in plant evolution; yet few data address the question of whether homeologous sequences evolve independently subsequent to polyploidization. We report on ribosomal DNA (rDNA) evolution in five allopolyploid (AD genome) species of cotton (Gossypium) and species representing their diploid progenitors (A genome, D genome). Sequence data from the internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS1 and ITS2) and the 5.8S gene indicate that rDNA arrays are homogeneous, or nearly so, in all diploids and allopolyploids examined. Because these arrays occur at four chromosomal loci in allopolyploid cotton, two in each subgenome, repeats from different arrays must have become homogenized by interlocus concerted evolution. Southern hybridization analysis combined with copy-number estimation demonstrate that this process has gone to completion in the diploids and to completion or near-completion in all allopolyploid species and that it most likely involves the entire rDNA repeat. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrates that interlocus concerted evolution has been bidirectional in allopolyploid species--i.e., rDNA from four polyploid lineages has been homogenized to a D genome repeat type, whereas sequences from Gossypium mustelinum have concerted to an A genome repeat type. Although little is known regarding the functional significance of interlocus concerted evolution of homeologous sequences, this study demonstrates that the process occurs for tandemly repeated sequences in diploid and polyploid plants. That interlocus concerted evolution can occur bidirectionally subsequent to hybidization and polyploidization has significant implications for phylogeny reconstruction, especially when based on rDNA sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Song, K., Lu, P., Tang, K., & Osborn, T. C. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.17.7719 · Cited by 1,019
Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex
O'Donnell, K., Cigelnik, E., & Nirenberg, H. I. (1998) · Mycologia · doi:10.1080/00275514.1998.12026933 · Cited by 963
Phylogenetic Incongruence: Window into Genome History and Molecular Evolution
Wendel, J. F., & Doyle, J. J. (1998) · Molecular Systematics of Plants II · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5419-6_10 · Cited by 649
Self-citationUtility of Low-Copy Nuclear Gene Sequences in Plant Phylogenetics
Sang, T. (2002) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409230290771474 · Cited by 357
Polyploid formation in cotton is not accompanied by rapid genomic changes
Liu, B., Brubaker, C. L., Mergeai, G., Cronn, R. C., & Wendel, J. F. (2001) · Genome · doi:10.1139/g01-011 · Cited by 353
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wendel, J. F., Schnabel, A., & Seelanan, T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1995-01-03
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 280-284
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1984839825
- Cited by
- 828
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bidirectional interlocus concerted evolution following allopolyploid speciation in cotton (Gossypium). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.92.1.280
- The paper
- Wendel, J. F., Schnabel, A., & Seelanan, T. (1995). Bidirectional interlocus concerted evolution following allopolyploid speciation in cotton (Gossypium). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.1.280
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.