The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Utility of Low-Copy Nuclear Gene Sequences in Plant Phylogenetics
Abstract
Low-copy nuclear genes in plants are a rich source of phylogenetic information. They hold a great potential to improve the robustness of phylogenetic reconstruction at all taxonomic levels, especially where universal markers such as cpDNA and nrDNA are unable to generate strong phylogenetic hypotheses. Low-copy nuclear genes, however, remain underused in plant phylogenetic studies due to practical and theoretical complications in unraveling the evolutionary dynamics of nuclear gene families. The lack of the universal markers or universal PCR primers of low-copy nuclear genes has also hampered their phylogenetic utility. It has recently become clear that low-copy nuclear genes are particularly helpful in resolving close interspecific relationships and in reconstructing allopolyploidization in plants. Gene markers that are widely, if not universally, useful have begun to emerge. Although utilizing low-copy nuclear genes usually requires extra lab work such as designing PCR primers, PCR-cloning, and/or Southern blotting, rapid accumulation of gene sequences in the databases and advances in cloning techniques have continued to make such studies more feasible. With the growing number of theoretical studies devoted to the gene tree and species tree problem, a solid foundation for reconstructing complex plant phylogenies based on multiple gene trees began to build. It is also realized increasingly that fast evolving introns of the low-copy nuclear genes will provide much needed phylogenetic information around the species boundary and allow us to address fundamental questions concerning processes of plant speciation. Phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analyses of developmentally important genes will add a new dimension to systematic and evolutionary studies of plant diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maddison, W. P. (1997) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/46.3.523 · Cited by 3,021
The its Region of Nuclear Ribosomal DNA: A Valuable Source of Evidence on Angiosperm Phylogeny
Baldwin, B. G., Sanderson, M. J., Porter, J. M., Wojciechowski, M. F., Campbell, C. S., & Donoghue, M. J. (1995) · Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden · doi:10.2307/2399880 · Cited by 1,850
Natural hybridization and evolution
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-0883 · Cited by 1,742
Relationships between gene trees and species trees.
(1988) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040517 · Cited by 1,622
Genome evolution in polyploids
Wendel, J. F. (2000) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1006392424384 · Cited by 1,600
Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae)
Sang, T., Crawford, D. J., & Stuessy, T. F. (1997) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.2307/2446155 · Cited by 1,458
Self-citationAngiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences
SOLTIS, D. (2000) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1006/bojl.2000.0380 · Cited by 1,331
INFERRING PHYLOGENIES FROM mt DNA VARIATION: MITOCHONDRIAL-GENE TREES VERSUS NUCLEAR-GENE TREES
Moore, W. S. (1995) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02308.x · Cited by 1,252
Hybrid origins of plant species
Rieseberg, L. H. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.359 · Cited by 1,246
Gene Trees and Species Trees: Molecular Systematics as One-Character Taxonomy
Doyle, J. J. (1992) · Systematic Botany · doi:10.2307/2419070 · Cited by 968
Metadata
- Authors
- Sang, T.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 121-147
- ISSN
- 0045-6411 (ISSN-L)
- 1040-9238
- 1549-7798
- OpenAlex
- W2137157357
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 15.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Utility of Low-Copy Nuclear Gene Sequences in Plant Phylogenetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10409230290771474
- The paper
- Sang, T. (2002). Utility of Low-Copy Nuclear Gene Sequences in Plant Phylogenetics. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409230290771474
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.