The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Failure of programmed cell death and differentiation as causes of tumors: some simple mathematical models.
Open accessAbstract
Most models of tumorigenesis assume that the tumor grows by increased cell division. In these models, it is generally supposed that daughter cells behave as do their parents, and cell numbers have clear potential for exponential growth. We have constructed simple mathematical models of tumorigenesis through failure of programmed cell death (PCD) or differentiation. These models do not assume that descendant cells behave as their parents do. The models predict that exponential growth in cell numbers does sometimes occur, usually when stem cells fail to die or differentiate. At other times, exponential growth does not occur: instead, the number of cells in the population reaches a new, higher equilibrium. This behavior is predicted when fully differentiated cells fail to undergo PCD. When cells of intermediate differentiation fail to die or to differentiate further, the values of growth parameters determine whether growth is exponential or leads to a new equilibrium. The predictions of the model are sensitive to small differences in growth parameters. Failure of PCD and differentiation, leading to a new equilibrium number of cells, may explain many aspects of tumor behavior--for example, early premalignant lesions such as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, the fact that some tumors very rarely become malignant, the observation of plateaux in the growth of some solid tumors, and, finally, long lag phases of growth until mutations arise that eventually result in exponential growth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
p53-Dependent apoptosis suppresses tumor growth and progression in vivo
Symonds, H., Krall, L., Remington, L., Saenz-Robles, M., Lowe, S., Jacks, T., & Van Dyke, T. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90534-7 · Cited by 880
Cited by
Differentiation and reversal of malignant changes in colon cancer through PPARγ
Sarraf, P., Mueller, E., Jones, D., King, F. J., DeAngelo, D. J., Partridge, J. B., Holden, S. A., Chen, L. B., Singer, S., Fletcher, C., et al. (1998) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/2030 · Cited by 988
ON THE FOUNDATIONS OF CANCER MODELLING: SELECTED TOPICS, SPECULATIONS, AND PERSPECTIVES
BELLOMO, N., LI, N. K., & MAINI, P. K. (2008) · Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences · doi:10.1142/s0218202508002796 · Cited by 420
Mathematical modeling of cell population dynamics in the colonic crypt and in colorectal cancer
Johnston, M. D., Edwards, C. M., Bodmer, W. F., Maini, P. K., & Chapman, S. J. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0611179104 · Cited by 279
Self-citationShankaran, H., Cronin, A., Barnes, J., Sharma, P., Tolsma, J., Jasper, P., & Mettetal, J. T. (2018) · CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.12255 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Tomlinson, I. P., & Bodmer, W. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1995-11-21
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 11130-11134
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2018297481
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Failure of programmed cell death and differentiation as causes of tumors: some simple mathematical models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.92.24.11130
- The paper
- Tomlinson, I. P., & Bodmer, W. F. (1995). Failure of programmed cell death and differentiation as causes of tumors: some simple mathematical models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.24.11130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.