The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The root of the universal tree and the origin of eukaryotes based on elongation factor phylogeny.
Open accessAbstract
The genes for the protein synthesis elongation factors Tu (EF-Tu) and G (EF-G) are the products of an ancient gene duplication, which appears to predate the divergence of all extant organismal lineages. Thus, it should be possible to root a universal phylogeny based on either protein using the second protein as an outgroup. This approach was originally taken independently with two separate gene duplication pairs, (i) the regulatory and catalytic subunits of the proton ATPases and (ii) the protein synthesis elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G. Questions about the orthology of the ATPase genes have obscured the former results, and the elongation factor data have been criticized for inadequate taxonomic representation and alignment errors. We have expanded the latter analysis using a broad representation of taxa from all three domains of life. All phylogenetic methods used strongly place the root of the universal tree between two highly distinct groups, the archaeons/eukaryotes and the eubacteria. We also find that a combined data set of EF-Tu and EF-G sequences favors placement of the eukaryotes within the Archaea, as the sister group to the Crenarchaeota. This relationship is supported by bootstrap values of 60-89% with various distance and maximum likelihood methods, while unweighted parsimony gives 58% support for archaeal monophyly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The GTPase superfamily: conserved structure and molecular mechanism
Bourne, H. R., Sanders, D. A., & McCormick, F. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/349117a0 · Cited by 3,392
Iwabe, N., Kuma, K., Hasegawa, M., Osawa, S., & Miyata, T. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.23.9355 · Cited by 902
Horizontal transfer of ATPase genes — the tree of life becomes a net of life
Hilario, E., & Gogarten, J. P. (1993) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/0303-2647(93)90038-e · Cited by 241
Cited by
An index of substitution saturation and its application
Xia, X., Xie, Z., Salemi, M., Chen, L., & Wang, Y. (2003) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00326-3 · Cited by 1,542
Eukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges
Embley, T. M., & Martin, W. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04546 · Cited by 867
Baldauf, S. L. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1085544 · Cited by 782
Self-citationEndosymbiosis and Eukaryotic Cell Evolution
Archibald, J. M. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.055 · Cited by 654
Genomic evidence for two functionally distinct gene classes
Rivera, M. C., Jain, R., Moore, J. E., & Lake, J. A. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.11.6239 · Cited by 543
Metadata
- Authors
- Baldauf, S. L., Palmer, J. D., & Doolittle, W. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1996-07-23
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 7749-7754
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2108684777
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The root of the universal tree and the origin of eukaryotes based on elongation factor phylogeny. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.15.7749
- The paper
- Baldauf, S. L., Palmer, J. D., & Doolittle, W. F. (1996). The root of the universal tree and the origin of eukaryotes based on elongation factor phylogeny. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.15.7749
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.