The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gene recognition via spliced sequence alignment.
Open accessAbstract
Gene recognition is one of the most important problems in computational molecular biology. Previous attempts to solve this problem were based on statistics, and applications of combinatorial methods for gene recognition were almost unexplored. Recent advances in large-scale cDNA sequencing open a way toward a new approach to gene recognition that uses previously sequenced genes as a clue for recognition of newly sequenced genes. This paper describes a spliced alignment algorithm and software tool that explores all possible exon assemblies in polynomial time and finds the multiexon structure with the best fit to a related protein. Unlike other existing methods, the algorithm successfully recognizes genes even in the case of short exons or exons with unusual codon usage; we also report correct assemblies for genes with more than 10 exons. On a test sample of human genes with known mammalian relatives, the average correlation between the predicted and actual proteins was 99%. The algorithm correctly reconstructed 87% of genes and the rare discrepancies between the predicted and real exon-intron structures were caused either by short (less than 5 amino acids) initial/terminal exons or by alternative splicing. Moreover, the algorithm predicts human genes reasonably well when the homologous protein is nonvertebrate or even prokaryotic. The surprisingly good performance of the method was confirmed by extensive simulations: in particular, with target proteins at 160 accepted point mutations (PAM) (25% similarity), the correlation between the predicted and actual genes was still as high as 95%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapid similarity searches of nucleic acid and protein data banks.
Wilbur, W. J., & Lipman, D. J. (1983) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.80.3.726 · Cited by 1,546
Cited by
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, C. F. G. R., Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057062 · Cited by 24,216
Birney, E., Clamp, M., & Durbin, R. (2004) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1865504 · Cited by 2,542
GMAP: A genomic mapping and alignment program for mRNA and EST sequences
Wu, T. D., & Watanabe, C. K. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti310 · Cited by 2,354
Hill, D. L. G., Batchelor, P. G., Holden, M., & Hawkes, D. J. (2001) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/46/3/201 · Cited by 2,093
Gene identification in novel eukaryotic genomes by self-training algorithm
Lomsadze, A. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki937 · Cited by 975
Metadata
- Authors
- Gelfand, M. S., Mironov, A. A., & Pevzner, P. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1996-08-20
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 9061-9066
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2149238618
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene recognition via spliced sequence alignment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.17.9061
- The paper
- Gelfand, M. S., Mironov, A. A., & Pevzner, P. A. (1996). Gene recognition via spliced sequence alignment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.17.9061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.