The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chromatin structure and gene expression.
Open accessAbstract
It is now well understood that chromatin structure is perturbed in the neighborhood of expressed genes. This is most obvious in the neighborhood of promoters and enhancers, where hypersensitivity to nucleases marks sites that no longer carry canonical nucleosomes, and to which transcription factors bind. To study the relationship between transcription factor binding and the generation of these hypersensitive regions, we mutated individual cis-acting regulatory elements within the enhancer that lies between the chicken beta- and epsilon-globin genes. Constructions carrying the mutant enhancer were introduced by stable transformation into an avian erythroid cell line. We observed that weakening the enhancer resulted in creation of two classes of site: those still completely accessible to nuclease attack and those that were completely blocked. This all-or-none behavior suggests a mechanism by which chromatin structure can act to sharpen the response of developmental systems to changing concentrations of regulatory factors. Another problem raised by chromatin structure concerns the establishment of boundaries between active and inactive chromatin domains. We have identified a DNA element at the 5' end of the chicken beta-globin locus, near such a boundary, that has the properties of an insulator; in test constructions, it blocks the action of an enhancer on a promoter when it is placed between them. We describe the properties and partial dissection of this sequence. A third problem is posed by the continued presence of nucleosomes on transcribed genes, which might prevent the passage of RNA polymerase. We show, however, that a prokaryotic polymerase can transcribe through a histone octamer on a simple chromatin template. The analysis of this process reveals that an octamer is capable of transferring from a position in front of the polymerase to one behind, without ever losing its attachment to the DNA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome
Thurman, R. E., Rynes, E., Humbert, R., Vierstra, J., Maurano, M. T., Haugen, E., Sheffield, N. C., Stergachis, A. B., Wang, H., Vernot, B., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11232 · Cited by 2,679
Chromatin accessibility and the regulatory epigenome
Klemm, S. L., Shipony, Z., & Greenleaf, W. J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0089-8 · Cited by 1,793
Transcriptional activation by recruitment
Ptashne, M., & Gann, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386569a0 · Cited by 1,158
Cicero predicts cis-regulatory DNA interactions from single-cell chromatin accessibility data
Pliner, H. A., Packer, J. S., McFaline-Figueroa, J. L., Cusanovich, D. A., Daza, R. M., Aghamirzaie, D., Srivatsan, S., Qiu, X., Jackson, D., Minkina, A., et al. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.044 · Cited by 789
HP1 and the dynamics of heterochromatin maintenance
Maison, C., & Almouzni, G. (2004) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1355 · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Felsenfeld, G., Boyes, J., Chung, J., Clark, D., & Studitsky, V
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1996-09-03
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 9384-9388
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2093217651
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromatin structure and gene expression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.18.9384
- The paper
- Felsenfeld, G., Boyes, J., Chung, J., Clark, D., & Studitsky, V. (1996). Chromatin structure and gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.18.9384
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.