The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preserved neuron number in the hippocampus of aged rats with spatial learning deficits.
Open accessAbstract
Hippocampal neuron loss is widely viewed as a hallmark of normal aging. Moreover, neuronal degeneration is thought to contribute directly to age-related deficits in learning and memory supported by the hippocampus. By taking advantage of improved methods for quantifying neuron number, the present study reports evidence challenging these long-standing concepts. The status of hippocampal-dependent spatial learning was evaluated in young and aged Long-Evans rats using the Morris water maze, and the total number of neurons in the principal cell layers of the dentate gyrus and hippocampus was quantified according to the optical fractionator technique. For each of the hippocampal fields, neuron number was preserved in the aged subjects as a group and in aged individuals with documented learning and memory deficits indicative of hippocampal dysfunction. The findings demonstrate that hippocampal neuronal degeneration is not an inevitable consequence of normal aging and that a loss of principal neurons in the hippocampus fails to account for age-related learning and memory impairment. The observed preservation of neuron number represents an essential foundation for identifying the neurobiological effects of hippocampal aging that account for cognitive decline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions
Morris, R. G. M., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. P., & O'Keefe, J. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/297681a0 · Cited by 6,340
West, M. J., Slomianka, L., & Gundersen, H. J. G. (1991) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1092310411 · Cited by 2,994
Effect of Neonatal Handling on Age-Related Impairments Associated with the Hippocampus
Meaney, M. J., Aitken, D. H., van Berkel, C., Bhatnagar, S., & Sapolsky, R. M. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3340858 · Cited by 1,074
Cited by
Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain
McEwen, B. S. (2007) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2006 · Cited by 5,429
Miranda, M., Morici, J. F., Zanoni, M. B., & Bekinschtein, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2019.00363 · Cited by 1,416
Sheline, Y. I., Sanghavi, M., Mintun, M. A., & Gado, M. H. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-12-05034.1999 · Cited by 1,382
“However, studies using unbiased stereological techniques have not found agerelated loss of neurons in the CA1‐CA3 hippocampal regions in humans, monkeys, or rodents (West, 1993; Rapp and Gallagher, 1996; Rasmussen et al., 1996).”
BackgroundLife and Death of Neurons in the Aging Brain
Morrison, J. H., & Hof, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5337.412 · Cited by 1,344
The cholinergic system in aging and neuronal degeneration
Schliebs, R., & Arendt, T. (2011) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.058 · Cited by 1,047
Metadata
- Authors
- Rapp, P. R., & Gallagher, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1996-09-03
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 9926-9930
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1992949974
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preserved neuron number in the hippocampus of aged rats with spatial learning deficits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.18.9926
- The paper
- Rapp, P. R., & Gallagher, M. (1996). Preserved neuron number in the hippocampus of aged rats with spatial learning deficits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.18.9926
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.